Peter Daniels reviews
by Mike Jenkins
The title is a good one: this book is a blending of space and sound. The spatially open form of the poems on the page seems to identify especially with the open moorland of South Wales where many of the poems take place. Jenkins also gives the sound of the words plenty of work, often with rhymes and rhythms which are less obvious than they might have been because the spread across the page draws the readerās attention; the subject of music occurs often, too (playing the cello, Fado singing, jazz) but also the sounds of the world around, as on the moors. The title poem presents āinstruments you cannot constructā, like the āhollowed tree / bass body / owl bassoonā ā he is not afraid of making images and parallels for nature out of the human world:
and the sigh
always the sigh
of the oakās lonely conducting.
(Some of the layout quoted in this review will be inevitably a rough reproduction.) Jenkins is bold with images that transform people and things into other people and things, all through the book but most notably in this subject area of nature and music. āTo Sing the Commonā takes this to the limit ā āthe sax / once a statue / of a snakeā plays āa different tune / for each incarnationā, while a cello becomes a calf and a piano emerges from a mineshaft. His exuberance with imagery runs the usual risks and in some poems there are a few misses.
The images and the words that convey them are held together by the way the poems place words like things on the page, creating spatial relationships. Occasionally this is a meaningful shape, as in āGyre Childā where the form is a gyre, but mostly they are abstract, following the line of breath and vocal expression. The layout of āFado Singerā is an expressive notation of the spaciousness as āshe sails / her ship of songā. This contrasts severely with the least expansive poem, which is placed opposite. It looks and feels limited, as well as being too much of a statement in a limping rhythm:
one million voices harmonising inside his head,
one million brothers and sisters: a requiem of red.
This poem, āKomitasā, about an Armenian composer, survivor of the massacres, is followed by āThe Tears of Pablo Nerudaā and āLegacies of Pinochetā, and while it feels like a clichĆ© to say political writing works better with home material, itās true here. A sequence about Northern Ireland, āWar Storiesā, takes its strength from first-hand observation, while the politics of the past and present of the industrial Valleys, and of Wales as a nation, have a tangible hinterland of experience in the book as a whole. The political passion can then attach to a dramatic moment or an image ā āevery palm a map / of the Valleysā for the coalminersā hands. In āThe Remainsā a man who āhad once been a physician / for every machineā is sent on some job-creation scheme to dig up landfill, so that āall the industries of his town / he flung onto a skipā, and like a mad cow āhe had been fed on the remains / of his own kinā.
Sometimes unposed as well as unanswered questions draw energy out of the poems, like the bare evocation of āthe brooding ghosts / of Dissenters and Chartists / who will not answer my requestsā (āFlags of Neonā), but some poems contain apparently personal meanings not fully explained which makes them stronger. āA Shrineā gives us the room of a dead woman in a softly spoken poem of pure grief; in āPassingā there is āa ghost still livingā, and the pain of the encounter comes clearly through our uncertainty about the back story:
father and son
passing where once
heād pushed me in a pram
not a word exchanged
Seren have obviously had a hard typesetting job, but there is no excuse for clumsiness and carelessness. The main serif font is on the small side, perhaps to fit the poems to the standard page size, but italics (and some non-italics) intrude in a larger heavy sanserif completely unrelated to it. This has to be a mistake rather than a design decision, and part of an overall inattentiveness to detail. With cellos making several appearances, there is inconsistency about whether to give the word an old-fashioned initial apostrophe: when it has one, this is carelessly left as Wordās automatic opening quote, not a proper apostrophe the same way round as a comma. Some page turns nearly spoil whole poems with a false ending, which brings in the question whether the format is appropriate for poems which depend so much on their space.
Here is an example of a busy publishing house having to turn out a regular-size product with a serious effect on the quality and effectiveness of the book. It would have helped to make a tighter choice of poems, for one thing. A bigger format for a more visual-style book would help to make each poem count satisfactorily; or should the poems even have been more tailored to the format of the book? In terms of sales it may seem better for this to be part of Serenās usual output: to be large enough to make the most of the poemsā layout, it would be hard to fit on shelves. But with good production perhaps that would encourage shops that do stock poetry to display it. Poems need space, and poetry publishers have to be responsible for creating or finding it.
Peter Daniels won first prize in the 2010 TLS Poetry Competition, and before that won the 2008 Arvon competition, the 2003 Ledbury competition, and was twice a winner in the Poetry Business pamphlet competition.
Comments