Skip to main content

Review: A Study In Pink

Updating Sherlock Holmes is never a bad idea.  Of the many characters in the public domain, few are as instantly timeless - a crime-solving eccentric genius in London, one of the world's great cities.  The BBC had a no-brainer on their hands.  Especially with the latest money-making film reboot starring Robert Downey Jr.  In this TV series, the keynote is the same: slightly irreverent humour, especially about the "gay thing" that perplexes and amuses many, vis. a vis. Holmes and Watson, his stalwart medical companion, sometimes more, sometimes less capable.    Different is the time - here we are "contemporary" - and get the same London as in Luther.  Overall, this is an excellent new version, with enough fun ("three patch problem") and style to make it good TV (as in "good police").  But it is hardly as clever as it wishes to think it is.  Screenwriters simply need to understand that aspects of their craft make them supremely easy to figure out in advance, for anyone in the know - which is all viewers over the age of three these days.  Firstly, the killer in this episode was a cab driver - and the idea of his "invisible status" - aside from being pinched from Chesterton (there it was a postman) - was telegraphed rather obviously several times (and is of course all too obvious from an actual crime case in London) - not least at the start.  Secondly, the Mycroft Holmes scene was also obvious - it couldn't have been Moriarty (though we were meant to think it was) - because such a villain would never be introduced in such a way, and would be less bland, less cartoon-mandarin (Moriarty would do better than have a sexy assistant and be able to control security cameras - this was more like a Coalition flunky); finally, his umbrella mirrored Watson's cane, implying mutual affiliation with Holmes.  Finally, Holmes' inability to tell whether Watson was gay (he has to ask him) makes no sense when he already knows about Watson's sister, and knows everything else about everyone else's sex life from their clothing.  I suppose the final problem for me is the suggestion that Holmes is a "high-functioning sociopath".  I realise this is a Dexter tie-in, and meant to imply he is oddly sinister to those who fail to get him - but Holmes is too empathic to be a sociopath.  Finally (again), Holmes would never torture a dying man.  Oh, and why would a megalomaniac (dying) cab driver / killer play a 50-50 game of poisoning if he got money for every victim?  Finally, talking someone in to selecting one of two capsules, with all the bluffs, is borrowed too liberally from The Princess Bride.  Much more intriguing was the possibility he had actually talked them into suicide.  As some drivers do, from time to time.

Popular posts from this blog


Like a crazed killer clown, whether we are thrilled, horrified, shocked, or angered (or all of these) by Donald Trump, we cannot claim to be rid of him just yet. He bestrides the world stage like a silverback gorilla (according to one British thug), or a bad analogy, but he is there, a figure, no longer of fun, but grave concern.

There has long been a history of misogynistic behaviour in American gangster culture - one thinks of the grapefruit in the face in The Public Enemy, or Sinatra throwing a woman out of his hotel room and later commenting he didn't realise there was a pool below to break her fall, or the polluted womb in Pacino'sScarface... and of course, some gangsta rap is also sexist.  American culture has a difficult way with handling the combined aspects of male power, and male privilege, that, especially in heteronormative capitalist enclaves, where money/pussy both become grabbable, reified objects and objectives (The Wolf of Wall Street for instance), an ugly fus…


According to the latest CBS, ABC, etc, polls, Clinton is still likely to beat Trump - by percentile odds of 66% to 33% and change. But the current popular vote is much closer, probably tied with the error of margin, around 44% each. Trump has to win more key battleground states to win, and may not - but he is ahead in Florida...

We will all know, in a week, whether we live in a world gone madder, or just relatively mad.

While it seems likely calmer heads will prevail, the recent Brexit win shows that polls can mislead, especially when one of the options is considered a bit embarrassing, rude or even racist - and Trump qualifies for these, at least.

If 42-45% of Americans admit they would vote for Trump, what does that say about the ones not so vocal? For surely, they must be there, as well. Some of the undecided will slide, and more likely they will slide to the wilder and more exciting fringe candidate. As may the libertarians.

Eyewear predicts that Trump will just about manage to win th…


Announcing the Shortlist for the 2016 Sexton PrizeSeptember 13, 2016 / By Kelly Davio
Eyewear Publishing is pleased to announce the shortlist for the 2016 Sexton Prize. The finalists are, in no particular order, as follows:

HISTORY OF GONE, Lynn Schmeidler
SEVERE CLEAR, Maya Catherine Popa
SIT IN THE DARK WITH ME, Jesse Lee Kercheval

The shortlist was selected by Eyewear’s Director Todd Swift with Senior Editor Kelly Davio. Don Share of Poetry Magazine will select the winning manuscript, which will be released at the 2017 AWP conference in Washington, D.C. The winner will be announced in October. 
Congratulations to our finalists!