Skip to main content

Todd Swift Compared to Police Brutality By Bonney?

If you think I started this, think again, folks - in the delusional world of Sean Bonney, I am some sort of corporate insider, close to the beating heart of British fascism - I quote from his blog, dated August 30 this year; this is weird, and offensive.  It is also entirely misguided.  I am a Catholic university lecturer who volunteers for Oxfam in my spare time, and edits poetry projects; I am published by a small press in the UK, Canada, and Ireland.  In what world am I part of "official poetry"?  Does this relate to Bernstein's "official verse culture"?  I have published positive reviews of Bernstein here at Eyewear.  Where did Bonney form this radical opinion of me, that I am some sort of whack of a police club?

What if all it can do is transform into the endless whacks of police clubs - certainly you get that in official poetry, be it Kenny Goldsmith or Todd Swift. Their conformist yelps go further than that, actually, as the police whacks in their turn transform into the dense hideous silence we’re living inside right now, causing immediate closing of the eyes, difficulty breathing, runny nose and coughing. Because believe me, police violence is the content of all officially sanctioned art. How could it be otherwise, buried as it is so deeply within the gate systems of our culture.

Comments

EYEWEAR said…
In the past, Bonney has also called me a "right wing comedy writer". He may be mixing me up with someone else...
Poetry Pleases! said…
Dear Todd

Everything is relative and I think that Sepp Blatter and John Terry find themselves in slightly warmer water than the editor of Eyewear!

Best wishes from Simon
Sean Bonney said…
Dear Todd,

It's a metaphor, which I thought would be clear. The piece you quote from is the last in a series of prose poems that were trying to think through a few issues around how a politically engaged, left-wing poetry could respond to the riots of last August.

I doubt you've read the whole poem. If you had, you would have noted that I quote the Martinique poet Rene Menil, and his claim that "poetry transforms itself dialectically into the voice of the crowd" - one of many such claims that left wing modernists made in the twentieth century regarding the political efficacy of poetry. I counter this, saying that much of what is called poetry is closer to the rhythm of police clubs - and then go on to name the four people who died as victims of police brutality in the week immediately following the riots. I name you, and Kenny Goldsmith as more or less arbitrary examples of an anodyne verse culture that either (1) disproves or (2) makes a mockery of the claims for poetry that were made by the European avant-garde. It's rude, of course. There's a great tradition of that in poetry, going right back to the Greeks.

Thank you very much, by the way, for your judgement that "this is weird, and offensive". I trust you won't mind me using that as a blurb at some point in the future. I don't, of course, make my work for people like you, I don't expect you to understand it, and I would frankly be worried if you liked it.

best,

Sean
Anonymous said…
This reminds me of a young author receiving a bad review and plastering their comments all over it trying to dissect it. I know the accusations here are stronger but I still don't think this is blog-worthy. Nor do I think any criticism that you have received is - by responding to it you invite more.
Henry said…
Rather than comment at length, I've made a couple of points at http://henrymking.blogspot.com/

H.

Popular posts from this blog

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se.  What do I mean by smart?

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and  Silence of the Lambs .  I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".

THE SWIFT REPORT 2023

I am writing this post without much enthusiasm, but with a sense of duty. This blog will be 20 years old soon, and though I rarely post here anymore, I owe it some attention. Of course in 2023, "Swift" now means one thing only, Taylor Swift, the billionaire musician. Gone are the days when I was asked if I was related to Jonathan Swift. The pre-eminent cultural Swift is now alive and TIME PERSON OF THE YEAR. There is no point in belabouring the obvious with delay: 2023 was a low-point in the low annals of human history - war, invasion, murder, in too many nations. Hate, division, the collapse of what truth is, exacerbated by advances in AI that may or may not prove apocalyptic, while global warming still seems to threaten the near-future safety of humanity. It's been deeply depressing. The world lost some wonderful poets, actors, musicians, and writers this year, as it often does. Two people I knew and admired greatly, Ian Ferrier and Kevin Higgins, poets and organise