Loud and Claire, or, A Pretty Good Gig

The BBC Radio 4 Today Programme today revealed a rather lax attitude towards poetry.  The reporter describing what the Oxford Professor of Poetry post entails described it, chuckling, as "a pretty good gig" - with a stipend and "only" having to "do" a few lectures.  This belittles one of the more arduous, intellectually demanding, and serious lecture series in the world devoted to poetry - perhaps the most serious.  Muldoon's and Heaney's contributions, to name only two, are among their best critical writing and speaking.  Anyway.  They then interviewed Paula Claire, who I admit Eyewear belittled when she entered the race - a fact I regret now.  When Claire explained why she had dropped out - for being described by the Oxford online authorities running the election as a "performer" and not a poet, the BBC radio chap chuckled (a lot of chuckling) and said it didn't seem "a big deal".  Claire rightly observed that in the UK, to be called a performer not a poet is a way of sometimes undercutting the value of the work.  Finally, as the spot ended, they said they hoped Michael Horovitz would win, so he could play his "anglosaxophone".  Which is a fine sentiment, but rather biased.  Equal time for Hill?

Comments

Poetry Pleases! said…
Dear Todd

To be honest I thought that Paula Claire came across as a typically paranoid poet. I was going to vote in this election but since I'm blithely indifferent to the outcome, I don't think I'll bother.

Best wishes from Simon
Todd Swift said…
"Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you" to paraphrase Mr. Cobain

Popular posts from this blog

My small press ethos

TEN TOP REASONS TO VOTE FOR TODD SWIFT FOR OXFORD PROFESSOR OF POETRY

Review of the new Simple Minds album - Walk Between Worlds