Skip to main content

Poem By Hamish Wilson

Eyewear is very pleased to welcome major British poet Hamish Wilson (pictured) to these pages this day. Wilson was born in 1958, and educated at Oxford, Cambridge and London Metropolitan universities. As a child he suffered from night fears, but his brothers made that go away, as he writes in his poem "Mind Robbers".

Wilson is one of the leading exponents of the "Light Bulb Makars" school, which, in the last few years, has become so influential on these isles. In his dour, sometimes grumpy, and often brilliantly dazzling reviews for the major papers (and BBC radio), Wilson has attacked any poetry which "uses language like frippery, like a girl's pink ribbon" and denounced "the fake makers, the fun-havers".

For Wilson, poetry is "science - and not just science - rigorous making, like hammering a sawblade back into shape after it has been bent by a fool." Wilson names his heroes as "Yvor Winters and Adam Smith", and bases much of his anti-rhetorical stance on Smith's own belles lettres lectures and the works of Popper. "Popper got it basically right," he's written in his study Sharp Vision: How To Write Poetry True To Experience.

Wilson has had three collections published, Break Bright Windows (1994), The Mind Robbers (2000) and, in 2007, his multi-award-winning Ovid In Scilly (2007). Indeed, Wilson has won all the prizes that the UK has to offer poets of his kind, often twice, sometimes three times. His proudest achievement is The Wallace Stevens Prize. He has also been the judge of all the leading prizes.

He is also an active editor - of poets, non-fiction writers (he favours salmon fishing books, and works on atomic physics) and novelists, all winners of prizes. He has put together the astonishingly rigorous anthology Lean Young Mean, which celebrates his belief that poetry is best written "by young men without fat on them, men fighting trim, men who think God is a sissy, and Dylan Thomas weak-minded." Drawing inspiration from Horace, then Hardy, then Larkin, he's written "Christ may be dead, but Homer was a Scotsman." His ideal poem is "clear as piss-water, clearer, like ice in a fist" and warns that "to read a poem is to engage in mud-wrestling with Lucretius."

He's also said "there's only one or two poets now writing of any worth." Not everyone agrees. Bjorn K. Bernstein, a leading avant-garde writer, has described Wilson as "a boob who thinks words are meant to mean, not buzz". The title poem, below, is in his trademark style, the "postmodern double-sonnet". Enjoy the genius.

Ovid In Scilly

No poems about makers -
making is more precise,
makes snow
look like ice
in a glass of Scotch.
Scotch that, break
the glass,
it is too colourful,
and creation, like space
should be dark, clear,
and not stuttered
like a signing, a bed
with stars, with oodles
of unheimlich fakers.

Mind robbers,
poets with words,
here, in wind and rain
I prefer to commence
again, unheard,
stark as an iron filing,
a central nail,
burrowed in the brain
of a lean young man
who shuns pastry;
whose sense of scansion
is less expansive
than a nun's
in a vast, erudite mansion.

poem by Hamish Wilson

Comments

Ben Wilkinson said…
Nice to see Eyewear honour such a wonderful and deserving contemporary poet, Todd.

I first came across Hamish Wilson's work when I read his much anthologised poem 'Break Bright Windows' from the collection of the same name. An absolute tour de force, I think, and a wonderful sort of dialogue with Larkin's 'High Windows'.

While Larkin is content to simply contemplate 'the sun comprehending glass', Wilson is characteristically brutal as the fluke meteor of the poem smashes such idle daydreaming - quite literally - to pieces, shards of glass catching his predecessor unawares. Stellar stuff.

Thanks muchly for posting 'Ovid in Sicily'.
Anonymous said…
I second Ben's approval. Hamish Wilson is one of the underrated geniuses of poetry, a writer whose aesthetic and ethical influence creeps up on every lean, young thing like a paedophile in a parking lot. I confess myself bedazzled.
moog said…
Just the jobbie.
No a poet whose a nobbie.
Nae nonsense, nae shite.
Here's a mon whae has it right.

He's the braw man fir the sannet
He swalleys words like a big gannet
An spits them oot like bullets at
Aw a them unheimlich twats

Heres a poet who'll blast aroon
Aw the awffy April goons
Fair play te Swifty for the finding
Of this great poet - where's he bin hidin?
Rob said…
He often appears on The Bill and other British TV cop shows as the guy standing behind the villains, but has never spoken a line. I think The Mind Robbers was inspired by those experiences - as metaphor, of course, or (as Bernstein put it, rather bitterly) as meta-for-nothing.
darren bifford said…
You may be happy to know that at least one human being--i.e., me--spent fifteen minutes searching the web (and scratching his head) for signs of this very disagreeable sounding, Popper-loving man, Hamish Wilson. Thanks.
Anonymous said…
Gad, this guy does all the things he accuses others of! A poem about poets complete with puns, cliches, awkward enjambments, pretentious abstractions, metaphors forced to carry so much weight they fall apart in less than a line, and an approach to the English language that is only slightly less flat, discursive and unimaginative than your typical academic poet. And it's all in the service of his apparent conviction that his mean-spirited and petty sense of superiority to others is somehow an important subject for poetry. Dylan Thomas must be crying in his grave at how far English poetry has fallen.

Popular posts from this blog

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se.  What do I mean by smart?

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and  Silence of the Lambs .  I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".

THE SWIFT REPORT 2023

I am writing this post without much enthusiasm, but with a sense of duty. This blog will be 20 years old soon, and though I rarely post here anymore, I owe it some attention. Of course in 2023, "Swift" now means one thing only, Taylor Swift, the billionaire musician. Gone are the days when I was asked if I was related to Jonathan Swift. The pre-eminent cultural Swift is now alive and TIME PERSON OF THE YEAR. There is no point in belabouring the obvious with delay: 2023 was a low-point in the low annals of human history - war, invasion, murder, in too many nations. Hate, division, the collapse of what truth is, exacerbated by advances in AI that may or may not prove apocalyptic, while global warming still seems to threaten the near-future safety of humanity. It's been deeply depressing. The world lost some wonderful poets, actors, musicians, and writers this year, as it often does. Two people I knew and admired greatly, Ian Ferrier and Kevin Higgins, poets and organise