Skip to main content

Planet-shaped Horse, a Review by Todd Swift

This picture has nothing to do with the reviewer or reviewee.  Apologies.

This will not be a review, because that would be boring and mean I have to talk about someone else.  Actually, reviews are little machines for pretending to be interested in someone else.  The longer they are, the more they are about the writer.  This review is about Luke Kennard.  Luke Kennard is two things we all want to be: tall and funny.  He is, thirdly, young, and fourthly, British, and fifthly, smart about poetry.  So that's six things, really, if you count famous.  I am not sure about rich.  Luke Kennard did not use my blurb on his new pamphlet.  This hurt until I realised it was an oversight.  Life is bearable again.  I like the title: Planet-shaped Horse.  Notice this is not Pluto-shaped Hearse.  Or Plant-shaped House.  Those will come.  Give him time.  Kennard is funnier than every other poet writing in Ireland and Britain, including Kevin Higgins, Simon Armitage, and John Hegley, who are the other really funny poets.  He is as funny as Canada's David McGimpsey.  He is that good.  He may be funnier than Apollinaire, who was only funny in French, which is like being sexy in Cornish.  I did not mean that.  I want to be ecumenical here.  He is like a screwball slapsticking a pratfall over a barrel of lubed-up monkeys.  He is the Goon Show meets Laurel and Hardy on Acid.  Planet-shaped Horse has its own Mr. Bones sort of thing happening - it has Simon and Miranda, who are characters who - in every poem which is like a new cartoon panel every day - change their identities like others change diapers: often, and for good reason.  This allows the poet/Kennard to be anywhere, but usually near to a mental halfway-home.  The key note word in all this is: prose poem minus poem to make it one word.  No one can write like Kennard but that won't stop the dogs dying.  People will now waste their lives trying to be him like we all were WC Williams for about 80 years.  Why do we still think Charles Olson was good when all he did was write lyrically with indents?  In New France, it was a royal decree that forbade sledding on snow in the 1600s that led to the death of fewer than five seigneurs - syntax off.  So - anyway, this new pamphlet is now the gold standard for surreal ha-ha English hu-mahr.  I also like the drawings and the funny bit about Hughes.  Dirigible mandolin sex practice, PART THREE.  Men want to be Kennard and woman want to be Kennard.  Does that mean we are all mortal?  Alcools on the Western Font.

Comments

Poetry Pleases! said…
Dear Todd

I have never actually read him but you make him sound rather interesting. Recently I've begun to wonder what the point of reviews really is. They are generally either a puff job if the reviewer is a friend of the poet or a hatchet job if they are not.

Best wishes from Simon

P.S. My poems are quite funny too!
English Poetry said…
I must admit, Todd, to not finding Kennard as funny as you and a lot of other fans of his, do. Perhaps this is because I am jealous, perhaps it is because I am not very clever, perhaps it is because 'I' have been bored by a thousand and one Kennardesque imitators over the past few years; these mimicking caricatures and copycats of what is, essentially, Monty Pythons Flying Circus; itself a 70's take on the surrealist Goons, who laid a template for British humor we have all ripped off and made our own, finding its release now in the poetic lines of Luke the lecturer, tall and witty, arranging a host of poems like Plethoric Air, 'the decomposing clown .. smashed on the balcony .. left shoe in the blood .. the doyen and her ten attachés scattering blossom on the divans .. charmed by a famous puppy, a dozen gold pins in her forehead;
a tendency to speak ill of the dead. 'The dead are so stupid,'
Luke said, 'using words we already hold to be meaningless.'

Wrought from the airy nothingness within his head, two dissimilar words, states, ideas or images, we 'saw the puppy flex her golden needles' The Buffoon of Unnatural Parsnips 'metaphors for the internet', gambolling along bright and cheery, youthful in zest and riffing on the Planet-shaped Horse in the gadzooks of this inner blah blah from a young one's first outstanding collection, always 'excellent' at 21, 22, 23; and always a chattering class of 'us' in critical mass, ponies and monkies, stags and does spent on the mojo of those we lent our ears to, at the bible of saint John and Sir Paul trapped outside The Harbour Beyond the Movie, The Migraine Hotel, our two brothers of sun that shaped our soul singing sweetly this song distinct and identical, apt and unsuitable, ying and yang opposites enjoined to matrons plunging from that LK 'nihilism .. fast becoming the richest source of meaning in my life', his turnips and swedes 'from the Embassy when the hairgrip fell out of her hair'.

A triple C class act where C means Celebrity Competence and Comprehension of things others lack, like lots of lovely X marking the spot where 'his colleagues chuckled and continued to admire her legs - this meastro of mirth teaching in Birmingham.

MC Lidl Class

Popular posts from this blog

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se.  What do I mean by smart?

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and  Silence of the Lambs .  I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".

THE SWIFT REPORT 2023

I am writing this post without much enthusiasm, but with a sense of duty. This blog will be 20 years old soon, and though I rarely post here anymore, I owe it some attention. Of course in 2023, "Swift" now means one thing only, Taylor Swift, the billionaire musician. Gone are the days when I was asked if I was related to Jonathan Swift. The pre-eminent cultural Swift is now alive and TIME PERSON OF THE YEAR. There is no point in belabouring the obvious with delay: 2023 was a low-point in the low annals of human history - war, invasion, murder, in too many nations. Hate, division, the collapse of what truth is, exacerbated by advances in AI that may or may not prove apocalyptic, while global warming still seems to threaten the near-future safety of humanity. It's been deeply depressing. The world lost some wonderful poets, actors, musicians, and writers this year, as it often does. Two people I knew and admired greatly, Ian Ferrier and Kevin Higgins, poets and organise