Tonight the great and the good of British Poetry will read, hosted by Carol Ann Duffy, Poet Laureate, to protest the cuts to arts funding in the UK. I won't be there. Pardon my French, but why shouldn't poetry also face its share of cuts during an austere time? Many poets I know (including myself) are from relatively wealthy backgrounds or have jobs; many poetry publishers are connected to successful larger publishing houses; it is true that the cuts may lead to the closure of a few good smaller presses - but poets need to get a grip, I think.
There are parts of society that need money far more. So long as education and the NHS are facing massive cuts, I for one cannot march demanding more money for poetry. Uniquely among the arts, poetry is almost free to write. All one needs is a pencil and paper. Also, like never before, publication is basically free, too. Blogs are free, and e-books very cheap. What is really being protested is the cutting of the old-style establishment vision of British poetry, based around a "Book Society", and small print-based presses, that mainly published and supported a certain kind of poetry.
British poets and publishers, except for Salt, have been behind the global trend. Poetry needs to move more to the digital realm, adopt new models of publication, and embrace increasing openness. Don't misread this post: if there was money to pay for free tuition for all students, and money to sustain the NHS, and money to move us onto a green economy, then yes, I'd say shower the poets with cash. But until then, we shall have to go it a little more on our own. Like Eliot and Auden and H.D. did.
There are parts of society that need money far more. So long as education and the NHS are facing massive cuts, I for one cannot march demanding more money for poetry. Uniquely among the arts, poetry is almost free to write. All one needs is a pencil and paper. Also, like never before, publication is basically free, too. Blogs are free, and e-books very cheap. What is really being protested is the cutting of the old-style establishment vision of British poetry, based around a "Book Society", and small print-based presses, that mainly published and supported a certain kind of poetry.
British poets and publishers, except for Salt, have been behind the global trend. Poetry needs to move more to the digital realm, adopt new models of publication, and embrace increasing openness. Don't misread this post: if there was money to pay for free tuition for all students, and money to sustain the NHS, and money to move us onto a green economy, then yes, I'd say shower the poets with cash. But until then, we shall have to go it a little more on our own. Like Eliot and Auden and H.D. did.
Comments
This post probably won't make you very popular with the British Poetry Establishment but I, for one, am strongly inclined to agree with you. British poetry is a perfect example of 'a dependency culture' that has got completely out of hand.
Best wishes from Simon
I couldnt agree more. One of the more extraordinary results of the recent cuts has been the sight of poets turning on each other, and the Arts Council - with hardly any engagement with the broader culture. Poets of my acquaintance bridle when you suggest they live in an ivory tower, but what are we to make of this small world response? As far as I can tell, the Arts Council has subsidised British poets, publishers and publications almost single-handedly for decades now. And continues to do so. I don't notice Carol Ann Duffy, for instance, turning down events or opportunities paid for by the AC.
Most damaging of all was Duffy's crass and frankly embarrassing 'poem' (I use the word advisedly) responding to the cuts. Nice to see that Poet Laureates still write rubbish.
Great site by the way.
James
I'd also wonder at the attitude implied by your statement that you and the poets you know are from "wealthy backgrounds"; this certainly isn't the case for myself and many of the poets I know. The "I'm alright Jack" stance you take threatens to smother a generation of poets less privileged than yourself.
Further, the idea that publishing on blogs and on cheap ebooks is a good replacement for a strong culture of poetry presses and organisations is one which needs questioning, I think. Poetry is an art which requires the reader - in order to truly appreciate a poem - to trust in its being worth reading: the concerted effort it takes to understand and work with the many ways and means language has of communicating isn't something that is easy to give. Giving such sustained attention to each one of the literally thousands of poetry blogs and e-zines just isn't realistic. We desperately need small and large presses alike to assert quality control to avoid poetry's public image slipping further into the mire.
And all of these arguments without even resorting to stating the numerous other ways to government could raise the relatively small amount of money to keep the PBS and other important enterprises afloat.