Skip to main content

Orange is not the only fruitcake

Oddly, the head judge of the forthcoming Orange Prize, Daisy Goodwin, has claimed that too many books by women involve sexual abuse, rape, and Asian twins. Instead, she would like more humour. Her complaint is that books seem dark, and focus on depressing issues. Where is the light stuff? The dumbing down of British culture continues apace. Where novels, such as Hard Times, or Middlemarch (to name one by a woman), once dealt with the struggle and hardship of human existence, now it appears, contemporary novelists who actually explore themes and concerns that are of relevance to actual women (alas, these include incest, abuse, rape, as well as twins) are in danger of boring readers like Goodwin. Perhaps the problem is such prizes themselves. Asking anyone to read 120 or more novels over a limited period is a marathon a day sort of madness. Instead of savouring, one begins to look for ways out of the tedium. So - a good laff. Ironically, whereas British novels are apparently ever-less-funny, more and more poetry is light etc. Maybe the judges of prose should come back to poetry. And leave the darkness to the big girls and boys.
Labels:

Comments

Poetry Pleases! said…
Dear Todd

If Daisy wants to read a funny novel, she should try 'The Pregnant Widow' by Martin Amis. It is a ridiculous and surreal work in many ways but has had me laughing out loud from page one.

Best wishes from Simon
Mon Mar 22, 11:29:00 am 2010
Sheenagh Pugh said…
I don't think that's an altogether fair reflection of what Goodwin said. She didn't object to dark materials being present but pointed out that the world contains light materials too and that a writer who wanted to reflect "real life" (the excuse for so much misery-writing) would actually need to include both. She mentioned the word "redemptive" and said, fairly enough, that novels with no redemptive possibilities are a bit depressing (also, I'd say, a bit unrealistic). And she said that one reason we pick up a book is to be entertained, in which I concur. That doesn't mean wanting only laughs; I for one find angst and tension immensely entertaining. In fact my gripe with a lot of contemporary litfic is that it ignores the need, the human craving, for story; there's a limit to the number of pages I can read about the inside of someone's head, while I wait desperately for something interesting to happen.
Mon Mar 22, 02:49:00 pm 2010
Zoe Brigley Thompson said…
I can't help thinking that actually there is a huge need for women to keep writing about the darker side of their experiences. From a feminist point of view, this kind of critique is hugely important in helping to bring about change. On the other hand, perhaps we need to be projecting how we would like the world to be rather than how it is.
Thu Mar 25, 03:49:00 pm 2010
ratu said…
I agree.. because there are a lot of fruit that can maked a cake...
Fri Apr 23, 08:31:00 am 2010
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se....
3 comments
Read more

Poetry vs. Literature

Poetry is, of course, a part of literature. But, increasingly, over the 20th century, it has become marginalised - and, famously, has less of an audience than "before". I think that, when one considers the sort of criticism levelled against Seamus Heaney and "mainstream poetry", by poet-critics like Jeffrey Side , one ought to see the wider context for poetry in the "Anglo-Saxon" world. This phrase was used by one of the UK's leading literary cultural figures, in a private conversation recently, when they spoke eloquently about the supremacy of "Anglo-Saxon novels" and their impressive command of narrative. My heart sank as I listened, for what became clear to me, in a flash, is that nothing has changed since Victorian England (for some in the literary establishment). Britain (now allied to America) and the English language with its marvellous fiction machine, still rule the waves. I personally find this an uncomfortable position - but when ...
15 comments
Read more

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and  Silence of the Lambs .  I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".
1 comment
Read more