Skip to main content

Guest Review: Westcott On Williamson

Sarah Westcott reviews

The blurb on the back cover of Heidi Williamson’s first collection focuses on the poet’s “fascination” with science and the exploration of what her publisher Bloodaxe calls “less usual territories” for poetry, including maths, computer programming and space travel.  But Electric Shadow is written from a more integrated, subtle area than the traditionally diametrically opposed cultures of poetry and science and their ‘territories’.
While Williamson does indeed write about sciency subjects, this collection is less notable for its scientific substance and content - and more for its clear-eyed approach to the world and its mysteries, with poems often written in the spirit of Keat’s negative capability.
Williamson’s writing has an openness to ‘not-knowing’, a spirit of exploration tempered with quiet rationality, a drive to convey the ‘astonishing state of possibilities’ in the world.  It also stems, like science, from a state of curiosity, with clarity of thought and close observation of natural phenomena key in the search for knowledge and groundedness:

While every poem ever written
about the moon rises before me,
I wait here, in the dark,

with my eyes wide open.

Electric Shadow is concerned with forms of light - skylines and sunsets, aurora borealis and shadows on the palm of a hand, a vertiginous view of a world where ‘space is only one mile up/closer than the next town.’
Again and again the reader is unsettled and tipped into something approaching a parallel universe - Williamson’s poems are peppered with the quotidian - caravans and card games and campsites - and yet they also zoom into the troposphere with sometimes giddying speed as she explores the slippage between times and states and places with precision of thought and language.
She acknowledges the essential chaos and instability at the heart of a universe ‘running away with itself / like a child on a red bike on Christmas Day,’ and often writes from a fixed perspective, where the present is a fulcrum from which to hang this shifting, sliding world.
There is a strong sense of being a still point, a distinct consciousness in many of her poems.  In ‘James Dean escorts his mother’s coffin’ the poet addresses the nine-year-old Dean in the second person, managing to inhabit his psyche and capture the sense of a relentlessly moving world as he looks from a train window:

Each stop you check your tender cargo
is not yet lost...
The world speeds past, begins to blur to nothing.
...Something inside you is peeling away.
...Somewhere within you a small cargo shifts.
Some things take a lifetime to travel past.

The centering effect is strong, too, in the poem ‘Flickr’, an unusual meditation on photography: ‘How quickly each country contracts/to thirty-six bits...The fact of being // far away recedes, becomes a fiction / you tell yourself over and over./ You check the evidence often / lacking something to hold / in your hand and believe. Like this.’
Most striking though is Williamson’s representation of two states existing simultaneously -  be they psychological or physical realities - a conundrum beloved of quantum physicists. In lines reminiscent of Frost’s 'The Road Not Taken', she entertains the possibility that being both incorrect and correct is compatible - that multiple possibilities can exist simultaneously.
In my favourite poem ‘Circus pony,’ ‘chosen / and not chosen become pathways,’ while in ‘Old tricks,’ a wonderful description of learning to swim, a girl takes her ‘first experience of flight, buoyed up, / surviving in two directions at once.’
The numinous partner in ‘The grand dance’ is ‘always there / and not there, against my cheek.’ And the subject of ‘The Travelling Salesman Problem’ is a construct, who ‘travels in the minds of mathematicians’  and who ‘has no form but going - a pure line.’ Yet Williamson also makes him tangible, sitting in jams, flogging ballpoint pens, a fallible and frail human being.
The sense of multiple selves is captured most explicitly in ‘At the hands-on science centre,’  which describes the disorientation of standing in a hall of mirrors and saluting ‘our many selves ... apart / but linked by science.’

...A slide to the right leaves
a curved staircase of ghosts rising behind us.
We spool endlessly away, the real us just
a frame in a film running before and after

(‘At the hands-on science centre’)

There is a refreshing lack of braggadocio in Williamson’s writing - lofty scientific concepts do not create an intellectual barrier for the reader, as they so easily could. The poet leaves space for poetry to bloom; sometimes subverting theoretical concepts to create some arresting, and almost comical imagery:

For her, theoretical physics
is a bird soaring next to a plane.
(‘Schrodinger’s pregnancy test’)

A discourse on static electricity - surely the first poem to do this in the world? - is also notable: ‘You collect it daily anywhere ... You’re barely aware of the loss / as each charge transfers / from you, to you ...’ (Static.)
Some of the most memorable poems are those that draw from personal experience and transmute it into the universal. Williamson’s apparently personal writing about childhood is especially powerful, beautifully evoking a British childhood of the 1970s and 80s - an era of Little Chefs, salt n shake crisps, and plastic jelly shoes:

...Prawn cocktail crisps and card game

punctuate the rain. The salt of sea and crackers
coats my lips like doughnut sugar. The sand
works my skin, smoothing, smoothing.

The chevronned, stainless steel steps,
removable, lead my jelly shoes to a world
of bare open skies.


I was struck, though, by the number of poems written in couplets - a quick count found twenty or so in the collection - and found myself occasionally wishing for a poem that experimented or even exploded form, a craving for an opening of white space on the page, in tandem with the openness of Williamson’s ideas and the lightness of the collection.
These are open-minded poems written in a spirit of exploration which offer up a liberating, expansive view of a world where ‘meaning brims/almost always.’ Highly recommended work which wears its metaphysicality lightly and with charm.

Sarah Westcott is a poet, blogger and journalist living in London.
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog


According to the latest CBS, ABC, etc, polls, Clinton is still likely to beat Trump - by percentile odds of 66% to 33% and change. But the current popular vote is much closer, probably tied with the error of margin, around 44% each. Trump has to win more key battleground states to win, and may not - but he is ahead in Florida...

We will all know, in a week, whether we live in a world gone madder, or just relatively mad.

While it seems likely calmer heads will prevail, the recent Brexit win shows that polls can mislead, especially when one of the options is considered a bit embarrassing, rude or even racist - and Trump qualifies for these, at least.

If 42-45% of Americans admit they would vote for Trump, what does that say about the ones not so vocal? For surely, they must be there, as well. Some of the undecided will slide, and more likely they will slide to the wilder and more exciting fringe candidate. As may the libertarians.

Eyewear predicts that Trump will just about manage to win th…


Like a crazed killer clown, whether we are thrilled, horrified, shocked, or angered (or all of these) by Donald Trump, we cannot claim to be rid of him just yet. He bestrides the world stage like a silverback gorilla (according to one British thug), or a bad analogy, but he is there, a figure, no longer of fun, but grave concern.

There has long been a history of misogynistic behaviour in American gangster culture - one thinks of the grapefruit in the face in The Public Enemy, or Sinatra throwing a woman out of his hotel room and later commenting he didn't realise there was a pool below to break her fall, or the polluted womb in Pacino'sScarface... and of course, some gangsta rap is also sexist.  American culture has a difficult way with handling the combined aspects of male power, and male privilege, that, especially in heteronormative capitalist enclaves, where money/pussy both become grabbable, reified objects and objectives (The Wolf of Wall Street for instance), an ugly fus…


The Oscars - Academy Awards officially - were once huge cultural events - in 1975, Frank Sinatra, Sammy Davis Jr, Shirley MacLaineandBob Hope co-hosted, for example - and Best Picture noms included The Conversation and Chinatown. Godfather Part 2 won. Last two years, movies titled Birdman and Spotlight won, and the hosts and those films are retrospectively minor, trifling. This year, some important, resonant films are up for consideration - including Hidden Figures and Moonlight, two favourites of this blog. Viola Davis and Denzel Washington will hopefully win for their sterling performances in Fences. However, La La Land - the most superficial and empty Best Picture contender since Gigi in 1959 (which beat Vertigo) - could smite all comers, and render this year's awards historically trivial, even idiotic.

The Oscars often opt for safe, optimistic films, or safe, pessimistic films, that are usually about white men (less often, white women) finding their path to doing the right thin…