From Judith Palmer
Dear Todd,
I don’t think we’ve ever met: so you may
have jumped to some wrong suppositions when you suggest the Poetry Review
Editor and I had ‘diametrically opposed viewpoints for the future direction of
the Poetry Society’. The geometrical positioning is far from polar.
My policy was always that the Poetry
Society should aim to reflect all poetries for all audiences. We employed
different strategies to reach different constituencies, and hoped to build
bridges between the different areas of our programme. A participant in the
Foyle Young Poets of the Year Award, for example, might aspire to be published
one day in Poetry Review. A visitor to Trafalgar Square who read our new
commissions around the Christmas Tree, might go on to explore membership, and
become a more regular reader of contemporary poetry.
Poetry Review has always been a central
part of the Poetry Society’s activities, with its own editorial independence,
which has never been threatened. There’s an agreement going back over 30 years
that the Review publishes the 3 winning poems from the Society’s National
Poetry Competition once a year – hardly an arduous imposition (with recent
winners including Helen Dunmore, John Stammers, Matthew Sweeney and Ian
Pindar).
When I commissioned our Poetry Society
Annual Lectures, the Review was given first refusal on publishing the texts. It
was free to decline, but chose to take up the offer. Last year, I commissioned
Les Murray, and this year CK Williams. The Annual Lecture has just toured for
the first time, taking in three venues, thanks to partnerships the Society
established with the Universities of Newcastle,
London and Liverpool.
If the
inclusion of Society-generated material from Williams, Murray, Dunmore,
Stammers, Sweeney and Pindar, serves as evidence of a watering-down campaign by
the Poetry Society, I don’t think readers of the Review have got much to fear
from the poetic Trading Standards Institute.
Perhaps it
would be instructive to take a look at a few of the other poets involved in the
Poetry Society’s artistic programme (excluding Poetry Review) over the past two
years, and check them for wateriness. Convenient as it is for scaremongers to
paint the Review as battling the forces of PoSoc mediocrity and populist
flimflam, the evidence suggests otherwise.
National
Poetry Competition judges: Neil Rollinson, Ruth Padel, George Szirtes, Jackie
Kay, Colette Bryce, John Glenday, Deryn Rees-Jones, Sinead Morrissey and Daljit
Nagra.
New commissions
from poets including Pauline Stainer, Simon Armitage, Roger McGough, John Mole,
Katrina Porteous, Ian McMillan, Andy Croft, Peter Samson, John Agard, Kit
Wright, Philip Gross and Kevin Crossley-Holland.
National
Poetry Day Live! Our live public performances at the Southbank Centre brought
together on the same stage John Hegley, Carol Ann Duffy, Lemn Sissay, Selima
Hill, Valerie Laws, Anjan Saha; Luke Kennard, Jane Draycott, Caroline Bird,
Ross Sutherland, Fiona Sampson, Robin Robertson and Ian Duhig.
Royal
Shakespeare Company, Stratford-Upon-Avon, our performance for the reopening of the
Swan Theatre featured Jackie Kay, Jo Shapcott, Jay Bernard and Kayo Chingonyi.
Our Edwin Morgan tribute at Poetry International combined Richard Price, Roddy
Lumsden and Bill Manhire.
The new Young
Poets Network website has commissioned poets including Clare Pollard, Inua
Ellams, Jon Stone, Kirsten Irving, Matthew Sweeney, Benjamin Zephaniah, Helen
Mort, Alex Pryce and Amy Key.
The Ted
Hughes Award has gone to Alice Oswald and Kaite O’Reilly, from shortlists
including Christopher Reid, Martin Figura, Paul Farley, Chris Agee, and
Katharine Towers.
Just a handful
more of the many names to have recently performed, written or acted as judges
for the Poetry Society: Mimi Khalvati, Stephen Romer, Stephen Watts, Ziba
Karbassi, Alison Croggon, Robert Gray, Linton Kwesi Johnson, Nikki Blaze, Vona
Groarke, Linda Chase, Dorothea Smartt, Ruth Fainlight, Jane Yeh, Joelle Taylor,
Elaine Feinstein, Sam Riviere, Glyn Maxwell, Jenny Hval, Sarah Howe, Andrew
Motion, Swithun Cooper, Imtiaz Dharker, Dannie Abse and Gillian Clarke. And
that’s before we even begin to talk about the education programme.
I admit it –
I thought it might be fun to get over a thousand people to knit a Dylan Thomas
poem to celebrate the Society’s centenary. The project received no public
funding, was created entirely on volunteer goodwill, and has toured extensively
round the country, from St Andrews to Much Wenlock, Manchester to Swansea,
Liverpool to Bridlington, taking in the British Library, Southbank Centre and
the V&A. Poets including Paul Farley, Anne Stevenson, Stephen Knight, Penelope
Shuttle, Maurice Riordan, John Hartley Williams, Julia Copus and Menna Elfyn
contributed short essays about ‘In My Craft or Sullen Art’; while knitters were
introduced to related poems by Seamus Heaney, Pablo Neruda, Emily Dickinson and
Gwyneth Lewis.
And through
these Poetry Society initiatives, over three million people read, wrote or
listened to more poems in the past 12 months.
The town’s
not small, and there’s plenty of room for all.
Best,
Best,
Judith
Judith, thank you for your letter, which is very interesting. I suppose what Poetry Society members might be confused by, in the light of your positive comments, is, why, given the brilliant and inclusive work you have done, you resigned. The resignation of several key people has made it appear that there is some sort of rift or crisis. Unfortunately, confusion can only result from there being no official explanation. I am not asking for one from you, of course. As for us never meeting, that is too bad. I would have loved to contribute to one of your projects, but was never approached. One of the reasons I let my membership lapse, I suppose, was the sense I didn't feel included. Which seems an odd thing for such an active promoter of poetry to feel.
ReplyDeleteHi Todd - With the extra 31% funding increase from the Arts Council we had just secured, we were going to have been able to extend our projects further to work with yet more poets - and who knows - you might have been next. Sorry not to have had the opportunity to work with you. Did you submit to the Review? best Judith
ReplyDeleteVery well put Judith, its just a shame people don't do their homework before commenting on what is clearly an non-elitist, extensive and inexhastiblly energetic society.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous - I did my homework - my comments about the Poetry Society were about what people were saying - not what I myself though. However, there is a real issue at stake of proper governance, and no one is debating whether the Society, in some ways, does good things.
ReplyDeletePerfect day for such a letter Quatorze Juillet/Bastille Day! Can we have more guest/posts/letters? How come this one happened today of all days?! Love it!
ReplyDeleteAsk your friends Todd! E.g. Fiona Sampson who has been "silent in public" all along I suppose.
Thanks for your ever present presence it is a present!
Merci beaucoup.
A good coup indeed.
Thanks for your message, Todd. Yes, I was sure you had been published in Poetry Review.
ReplyDeleteAs far as the Society was concerned, we always tried to consider the balance of what we did in the round, across all our programmes. If you were published in the Review - the Poetry Society's magazine - you had indeed been very much a part of the Society's activities. Very glad to hear it! best Judith
So where are the non-mainstream, experimental, visual, post-avant, Language, linguistically innovative or whatever you choose to call them then? Once again, noticeable by their absence.
ReplyDeleteSorry, but you do not represent all poetries, Judith. Never have done.
I take 'anonymous' 2.22's point. Although that hasn't been a dominant strand, we managed a few things involving writers such as Allen Fisher, Sean Bonney, Jeff Hilson and Valerie Laws, we were working with SJ Fowler/Maintenant and were glad to do more. Judith Dean had a long residency in the Poetry Cafe making experimental interventions. Poetry News regularly includes articles about concrete /visual/ found/ inter-disciplinary work; and much of the successful Foyle Young Poets' work is astoundingly innovative, definitely not bowing to any one tradition. Our Edwin Morgan tribute came out of respect and passion for the linguistically innovative.
ReplyDeleteDon't scare the horses, but the knitted poem was trying to mix the experimental and lyric traditions. Knitters never knew what the final poem was going to be - they only knew the letter they were responsible for. You should have seen the Thomas poem when it was laid out deconstructed into its component letters. It was pure Cobbing.
The theme of National Poetry Day 2011 is 'games'. The theme was chosen with linguistic invention in mind, and there's still time before NPD on 6 October to contact (err someone??) at the Society with ideas.
I didn't say we represented all poetries, I said it was our aim to try.
Best, Judith
Judith I dont understand your argument. You are clearly wrong.
ReplyDelete