Skip to main content

THE UK GOVERNMENT IS WRONG IN HOW THEY ARE HANDLING THE PANDEMIC - AND IT WILL KILL MILLIONS


When a brilliant scientist like John Ashton says the government's Covid-19 strategy is wrong, you should sit up and listen. See his bio below (note he is not the author of this editorial).

 Today, the top scientist in Boris's circle of boffins, 'Sir Patrick', said he was comfortable with 60% of the UK population getting the disease - because we need 'herd immunity' and that it will 'return annually' and that 'it can't be stopped'. All of these comments should get him replaced immediately. Consider if your top general announced the enemy could not be defeated?

 You'd fire him. More seriously, this almost inhumanely-cold approach (reminiscent of notorious mid-century experiments on large populations) takes for granted that 1% of the population will (must) die for this 'herding' to work... that's giving up on upwards of half a million people in the most threatened categories in the UK alone...

 This extraordinary idea - to let the virus pandemic proceed among the populace, is dangerous and flawed-thinking because 1) we known China managed to STOP THE SPREAD in a country of more than a billion people; and 2) WE ONLY NEED TO DELAY THE SPREAD UNTIL A VACCINE IS FOUND in 2021; and 3) It is not even clear IMMUNITY IS POSSIBLE with this obligate parasite; some coronaviruses - like the common cold - do not generate herd immunity.

 Sir Patrick's eccentric focus on future years misses the point - most every other country - from South Korea, to Italy, to Ireland, is locking down now, for the next few months, to SAVE ITS PEOPLE FROM DYING.

 If there was no hope of a vaccine, the UK's indifference would make sense - but their seeming-ultra-negligence has been monocle-popping, and is probably guided by a top-level interest in evolutionary biology - this is social Darwinism masking as verifiable science. It isn't.

 The UK has not closed borders; does not test visitors; refuses to shut schools, or large events. It has not closed theatres, cinemas, shops, bars, pubs, or sports terraces. Why?

 Herding.

 The UK government policy appears to be to cull the population - let the weak, old and infirm to die - so that the strong can be 'immunised'.

 Maybe in Sparta or Prussia this would be sensible.

 In the 21st century, as Professor Ashton and other scientists are saying, it is swaggering inhumanity dressed up as expertise - this is Brexit in all but name, all over again - Britain against the world and its science. As the New York Times observed the other day - this government is more concerned with protecting the economy than its citizens's lives. Is the reluctance to shut down really about saving a way of life, or to fend off more market collapse?

 We are not a herd - as Jung once observed, scientists see humans (at our peril) as a whole, not as individuals. We must humanise this discussion. No one's mother, grandfather, or disabled child MUST DIE.

 Sir Patrick's PERFIDIOUS PANDEMIC PLAN needs to be RETHOUGHT.
Professor John Ashton CBE (born 27 May 1947 in Liverpool) is a former lecturer and professor of public health at Southampton/London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine /and the University of Liverpool Medical School. He was Regional Director of Public Health/Regional Medical Officer for the North West of England for 13 years and Director of Public Health/County Medical Officer for 6 years.

at the Socialist Health Association conference on the 25th anniversary of the Black Report
He was one of the initiators of the World Health Organisation's Healthy Cities Project from 1986 to 1988 during which time it went from being a European project to a global movement[1] and a pioneer of three public health initiatives.[2]
-----



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se....
3 comments
Read more

Poetry vs. Literature

Poetry is, of course, a part of literature. But, increasingly, over the 20th century, it has become marginalised - and, famously, has less of an audience than "before". I think that, when one considers the sort of criticism levelled against Seamus Heaney and "mainstream poetry", by poet-critics like Jeffrey Side , one ought to see the wider context for poetry in the "Anglo-Saxon" world. This phrase was used by one of the UK's leading literary cultural figures, in a private conversation recently, when they spoke eloquently about the supremacy of "Anglo-Saxon novels" and their impressive command of narrative. My heart sank as I listened, for what became clear to me, in a flash, is that nothing has changed since Victorian England (for some in the literary establishment). Britain (now allied to America) and the English language with its marvellous fiction machine, still rule the waves. I personally find this an uncomfortable position - but when ...
15 comments
Read more

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and  Silence of the Lambs .  I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".
1 comment
Read more