Abigail O'Hanlon reviews
by Katha Pollitt
I am acquainted – if perhaps less well than
I ought to be – with Descartes’ mind-body problem of reconciling the seemingly
intangible mind with the physical body. Even before Pollitt’s second collection
is opened, then, it declares itself to be dealing with heavy subject matter, so
the titular poem comes as a refreshing surprise as it becomes apparent it is
not quite what you might expect from the title. The problem addressed here is
not strictly of the mind and body but, rather, between them:
that my body had to
suffer
because I, by which I mean my mind, was saddled
with certain unfortunate high-minded romantic notions
that made me tyrannize and patronize it
because I, by which I mean my mind, was saddled
with certain unfortunate high-minded romantic notions
that made me tyrannize and patronize it
like a cruel
medieval baron
The idea of youthful anxiety over self-image
is not a new one. In fact, it is so well established by now it risks becoming
tiresome, but what Pollitt does in this poem, as in this whole collection is to
re-illuminate old concepts. The way Pollitt presents her own visions of such
ideas is intelligently handled. She applies her own philosophy to themes of
identity and the individual, mortality, the passing of time and the basic
question of what it is to be.
Pollitt is heavily influenced by figures like
Descartes, but also interesting is the inclusion of Eastern thought in her
inspiration. In 'A Walk', she reflects on the “melancholy restraint” of the Ancient
Chinese poets, even going so far as to quote Xīn Qìjí, “who when old and full
of sadness / wrote merely, A cool day, a
fine fall.” Several of the poems in this collection feel informed by the
lean, esoteric style that is often present in Eastern poetry – in terms of
diction, most notable are the minimalistic 'The Heron in the Marsh' or 'IntegerVitae'. The largely unornamented language reflects the simplicity the
poems are trying to convey – “that’s how we’d live / if living were enough: / innocent,
single-hearted”. These poems also demonstrate Pollitt’s ability to invoke
strong images with only as many words as are needed:
At the end of summer
stands white and alone
a question mark
among the green reeds
that glow even as they fail.
stands white and alone
a question mark
among the green reeds
that glow even as they fail.
In this collection, Pollitt’s work arguably
favours free verse rather than rigidly structured traditional forms. Though she
appears to be less concerned with it, this is not to say Pollitt dismisses form
– take her contemporary sonnet 'Old Sonnets', or 'The Cursed Fig Tree', with
its stark meter and almost uniform rhyme scheme. For the most part, Pollitt
rarely rhymes, but when she does it is all the more effective.
A short middle segment in this collection
titled 'After the Bible' does seem to stick out somewhat: perhaps the poems in
this section would have been better interspersed throughout the collection
rather than segregated. Despite this, these poems are of no lesser quality than
the rest of them. Here, Pollitt re-examines different Biblical characters and
personae – not even God is exempt. From this section, 'Moth' stands out as a more playful, fanciful poem, opening with “Come
bumble-footed ones, / dust squigglers, furry ripplers”. Yet it has enough depth to steer it away from
whimsy – compare the closing lines: “at one with the burning world / whose one
desire is to escape itself”.
Pollitt enjoys combining the lofty abstractions
of philosophy with her own more down to earth experiences, and many of these
poems are a fusion of both the ethereal and the personal. 'Maya' – the mystic
belief that the distinction between consciousness and the material world is an
illusion – is an example. Pollitt begins the poem by reminiscing, and the first
two stanzas are full of internal half-rhymes that give it an excitable,
fanciful feel: “flushed from our dash through the common, stamping our snow- / caked
boots like Cossacks”. There is also a curious, swinging rhythm in the beginning
of the third stanza: “we flung into our bon- / fire mere phenomena”, sounding
cleverly ephemeral.
In the fourth stanza, the poetic speaker comes to the fore:
It’s
all maya – I still say that, Cartesian
to the end, and yet it comes back differently
now I believe it, everything is illusion
and yet is no less everything
to the end, and yet it comes back differently
now I believe it, everything is illusion
and yet is no less everything
Here she brings the reader back to the
titular mind-body problem, unafraid to quite clearly show her own stance. The
key phrase here is in the latter two lines, central to the poem.
By the final stanza, Pollitt fully shifts into
a more reflective, restful tone. She uses deliberate end-line rhyme to provide
weight to her final image: “on [...] the train today / from which I watched,
beyond my dim reflection, / the silent, bright elms burn themselves away.”
The Mind-Body Problem is a collection that
combines Pollitt’s experiences with her own philosophical questions: perhaps
she doesn’t go all the way to answering them, but instead leaves such
conclusions up to the reader. This book is one that deserves repeated readings
– there is a new insight to be gained every time you do.
Abigail O'Hanlon is a young British poet, in her third year of an English and Creative Writing BA degree at Kingston University.
Comments