Skip to main content

No More Anonymous

Eyewear is tired of the sad and vindictive people out there in the blogosphere who think it makes sense to bravely stand up for themselves, anonymously, and insult me for taking a public stand.  The chief problem with the world of poetry (all worlds?) is transparency - there isn't enough of it.  I stand by my (admittedly evolving, like Obama) views.  Nor do the contributors to this blog ever need to share these views.  I find it pitiful to be receiving very personal, nasty attacks, often daily.  I am a liberal Catholic capitalist - get over it.  I could pretend otherwise, but as the owner of a small business who regularly attends Mass, but is open to freedom of speech and votes for the Lib Dems - none of which ashames me - it would be madness to claim otherwise.  None of these views is without fault - show me which ideology, or belief, is flawless.  However, if I prefer not to roar approval of a victory for socialism in Greece and France which threatens the Merkel consensus for Europe, so be it.  I hope I am proved wrong.  But we are in debt, folks - badly in debt.  Borrowing much more is not, to my mind, fiscally wise - but then again I am a fiscal conservative.  Anyway, all this to say - I have blocked anonymous comments from this blog for now.  Dare to name yourself, if you wish to make a point.

Comments

Tom Phillips said…
Perhaps the question, though, is 'Are we really in debt?' Or are we only in debt because a certain stratum of our globalised (i.e. neo-colonialist) system is siphoning off the profits to tax-exile multi-billionaires? Because Bill Gates - or indeed Angela Merkel - thinks he/she rules the world? That a great swathe of Europe's population has rejected austerity is significant. Indonesia, for example, is doing very well indeed out of spending like there's no tomorrow. What troubles me, above all things, is that the current depression is making people think narrowly, nationalistically. We are, whether anyone likes it or not, all in this together. It is, perhaps, time to stop bickering about Keynesian economics and look at the alternatives. Call me old-fashioned, but Marx pretty much had it sussed, as far as I'm concerned. It's also worth listening to the Cold War dissidents like Havel or Solidarnosc - a genuine third space where ethics actually has some kind of influence - Levinas, Derrida, Tischner would be a good place to start. Otherwise we're just ramblers weaving across the inhumane terrain defined by Thatcherism.
The Editors said…
Todd, I'm with you: anonymous comments are to be deplored and only serve to lower the tone of debate on the internet. It's a known problem of online debate that anonymity or pseudonymity - sp? - help to create a kind of forcefield around those who adopt them as modes of communication, driving them to pitches of irrational rhetoric that they would be appalled to utter in the 'real' world. I've always made it my policy to be as polite - and as candid - to people in an online setting as I would be to them if I met them in the street. It seems the only sensible option, and helps keep debate above the level of the playground mob.

Simon Turner @ Gists and Piths
Poetry Pleases! said…
Dear Todd

I myself am a cynical, socialist protestant but to quote Voltaire, 'I do not agree with a single word you say, but I will defend to the death your right to speak!'

Best wishes from Simon

Popular posts from this blog

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se....

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and  Silence of the Lambs .  I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".

THE SWIFT REPORT 2023

I am writing this post without much enthusiasm, but with a sense of duty. This blog will be 20 years old soon, and though I rarely post here anymore, I owe it some attention. Of course in 2023, "Swift" now means one thing only, Taylor Swift, the billionaire musician. Gone are the days when I was asked if I was related to Jonathan Swift. The pre-eminent cultural Swift is now alive and TIME PERSON OF THE YEAR. There is no point in belabouring the obvious with delay: 2023 was a low-point in the low annals of human history - war, invasion, murder, in too many nations. Hate, division, the collapse of what truth is, exacerbated by advances in AI that may or may not prove apocalyptic, while global warming still seems to threaten the near-future safety of humanity. It's been deeply depressing. The world lost some wonderful poets, actors, musicians, and writers this year, as it often does. Two people I knew and admired greatly, Ian Ferrier and Kevin Higgins, poets and organise...