Skip to main content

Cut It Out

The news that the severe arts-funding cuts of the Tory-led British government have led to the Poetry Book Society (established by the Arts Council in 1953 by TS Eliot) losing all its funding have set up howls of rage and surprise from Britain's best and brightest poetry lovers.  Meanwhile, same perplexed poets have noted on Facebook, with something akin to rebel-Libyan rage, that commercial behemoth Faber and Faber have been given £40,000.

There is an irony here - the PBS is about as establishment as one can get in British poetry - it awards the TS Eliot Prize that often goes to Faber poets (Walcott this year for instance), and which, if any organisation does, brings poetry to "poetry lovers" in the UK.  I don't belong to the organisation, for reasons that it would seem mean-spirited to mention now - one doesn't kick a horse when it is down, unless one wants to upset a philosopher.  Yet, I think it is a part of the landscape one wouldn't want to see go.  Like selling off all the forests, this doesn't make sense.  It really is a total slap in the face, and confirms that, in secular Britain, after religion goes, next is poetry.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Yay ah Toddy larghh!!

Take no notice of me mate, I am just buzzing off the change in tenor from last night, noting you've been on a roll satire-wise, and this struck into me the urge to extemporise in response and waffle somewhat, as I sit here after just getting out the scratcher, wondering on the sad facts in this servile art that propel one so, Toddy larghhh!!

Anyway, take no notice of this, don't publish it, as I am only writing to offer my thoughts on the bit of editing you've done in the 12 hours or so since this post appeared.

I didn't copy and paste the original and so can't be accurate in respect of quoting you, but the original version made a far more powerful impression on me than this truncated one.

To the outsider non in-crowd reader who will not be giving a flying turd about the micro-politics of this venal art called barding-about, pretending we know what language is and creating ditties and doggerel in the name of ACE, as in ace, as in doing it for the love of lingo and being good at it, as in being original and interesting with the choices we make when combining words into summat better than our peers; the original version makes, I am pretty sure, a far more memorable impression.

The original has greater gravity. And I am not taking the mick on this, it's just that I am like you, in the sense of doing my own thing, having a more well developed poetic instinct than most, because , like you I've followed my own note and not been an 'excellent' mug in the UK poet-sheeple crowd, who timidly hide 'emselves, oohin and ahing in all the right places as a way of selling out before they begin, kissing the right ass.

Anyway, keep up the good work, your one of the few outsiders who do stick it to the oh so terribly self-important UK po-biz know-alls and I just thought I'd let you know, coz I've gone with my instinct, thinking my post had an effect on your thinking.

Far be it from me to tell you what to publish, but your original truth-telling made much more of an impact on me as an objective, normal reader uninvolved in the UK po-biz nonsense, than this milder version.

Cheers

Kevin Desmond English MacNichols Masterson Prendergast Swords, six names from eight in one's derbfine, that we bards knew all about in our 12 year training from foclo to ollamh..

Don't worry, Dave Wheatley got reams of this kind of chat from me in 2008 when I imagined I was going from cli to anruth, and I think he got the sense I am genuine in being a true lover of the bardic arts. My ars poetica..

gra agus siochain

Popular posts from this blog

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se.  What do I mean by smart?

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and  Silence of the Lambs .  I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".

THE SWIFT REPORT 2023

I am writing this post without much enthusiasm, but with a sense of duty. This blog will be 20 years old soon, and though I rarely post here anymore, I owe it some attention. Of course in 2023, "Swift" now means one thing only, Taylor Swift, the billionaire musician. Gone are the days when I was asked if I was related to Jonathan Swift. The pre-eminent cultural Swift is now alive and TIME PERSON OF THE YEAR. There is no point in belabouring the obvious with delay: 2023 was a low-point in the low annals of human history - war, invasion, murder, in too many nations. Hate, division, the collapse of what truth is, exacerbated by advances in AI that may or may not prove apocalyptic, while global warming still seems to threaten the near-future safety of humanity. It's been deeply depressing. The world lost some wonderful poets, actors, musicians, and writers this year, as it often does. Two people I knew and admired greatly, Ian Ferrier and Kevin Higgins, poets and organise