Skip to main content

Review: Vices & Virtues

James Christopher Sheppard reviews
the new Panic! At the Disco album
Vices & Virtues

In 2005, Panic! At the Disco burst onto the music scene and rose quickly to the very top of the huge emo/rock genre. Their debut album, A Fever You Canā€™t Sweat Out, had a theatrical and upbeat fun rock vibe, which went hand in hand with their groundbreaking shows. With lyrics on their first two albums penned by now departed member, Ryan Ross, itā€™s going to be tough for the new line up, Brendon Urie and Spencer Smith, to match the same depth of lyrical issues the band were known for. Second album, Beatles inspired Pretty. Odd., featured a departure in sound for the band, plus they dropped the much-loved exclamation mark from their name. As a result, the album had underwhelming sales and a luke-warm reception from their fans. Vices & Virtues seeā€™s the band re-instating their original name, Panic! At the Disco, and sounding more theatrical and rock orientated, employing the same style as their debut, but how does it compare?

ā€˜The Ballad of Mona Lisaā€™
Musically in-keeping with their debut, this first single stands far enough away from the material on their first album to show the bands growth, but also shows that Urie and Smith have realized and are playing to their strengths. The creeping, slightly distorted piano that opens the track is a good indication that Panic! are back and mean business. A dark and upbeat roaring track, this provides a promising start to the album.

ā€˜Letā€™s Kill Tonightā€™
The drum machine and vocal effect featured at the beginning of this track, again, is a sound familiar to the lovers of the bandā€™s debut. By the chorus, the track has taken quite a different and intriguing turn, however, becoming darker and angrier. This almost sounds like the Panic! of 2005 meeting Lostprophets, which surprisingly works and provides an invigorating and fresh sound.

ā€˜Hurricaneā€™
ā€˜Hurricaneā€™ sounds a lot like it belongs on a Fall Out Boy album. Catchy and danceable, the track circles around the line ā€˜youā€™ll dance to anythingā€™, which is quite a provoking statement. Not bad by any means, but there is nothing unforeseen here.

ā€˜Memoriesā€™
The opening of ā€˜Memoriesā€™ sounds slightly Manic Street Preachers-esque which is unexpected after ā€˜Hurricaneā€™. Musically and lyrically moving, strings soar and the tempo keeps an uplifting pace, ā€˜Memoriesā€™ is the song that hears the boys reflecting on the troubled past of the band. One to download if you are cherry picking.

ā€˜Trade Mistakesā€™
Another string heavy track, Urie sings of self-loathing and ā€˜sinking like an anchorā€™, ā€˜sinking herā€™. Lyrically, ā€˜Trade Mistakesā€™ is one of the saddest songs, although that isnā€™t overly reflected in the production.

ā€˜Ready to Go (Get Me Out Of My Mind)ā€™
The driving track of the album, this is destined to be played loudly while driving fast in the summer sun. There is something very revitalizing and care-free about this track. Altogether, ā€˜Ready to Goā€™ is a great pop-rock track and is very radio friendly.

ā€˜Alwaysā€™
The first track to heavily feature the sound of an acoustic guitar, this track will be popular with fans of the bands second album, as well as fans of bands like the Plain White Tā€™s. ā€˜Alwaysā€™ is a simple, sweet song with a calming melody and catchy vocal arrangement.

ā€˜The Calendarā€™
This track, even after several listens, fails to grab your attention. The music is quite charming, but the track is unfortunately pretty instantly forgettable.

ā€˜Sarah Smilesā€™
Sounding like it should be on Nightmare of Youā€™s self-titled album, ā€˜Sarah Smilesā€™ has the feel of about three completely different, already recorded tracks, being thrown together. There is little originality here, if any at all.

ā€˜Nearly Witches (Ever Since We Met)ā€™
After the last few paint by numbers tracks, the album closer is a welcomed dose of flamboyant quirkiness. With an odd psychedelic opening, this is one of the albumā€™s more memorable moments. Everything from the vocal arrangement, the theatrical choir, the excited ā€˜wooā€™, the unexpected camp ā€˜do do do do doā€™ in the background, the blissful chorus and the line ā€˜my one regret is youā€™ is Panic! At The Disco coming very close to recapturing the magic that was unquestioningly once theirs.

Verdict

If what drew you to Panic! At the Disco back in 2005 was their flamboyant melodramatic lyrics and striking titles, you will be left very disappointed by Vices and Virtues. If you loved the bandā€™s theatrical, rock-pop upbeat feel, then youā€™ll be pretty happy. This new collection sits musically fairly near the bandā€™s debut A Fever You Canā€™t Sweat Out, but just doesnā€™t quite capture the same theatricality of the lyrics.  It is a very listenable album, but, despite a few cracking tracks, the expiry date on how often you will feel yourself craving to hear the whole album, may well be short-lived. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se....

Poetry vs. Literature

Poetry is, of course, a part of literature. But, increasingly, over the 20th century, it has become marginalised - and, famously, has less of an audience than "before". I think that, when one considers the sort of criticism levelled against Seamus Heaney and "mainstream poetry", by poet-critics like Jeffrey Side , one ought to see the wider context for poetry in the "Anglo-Saxon" world. This phrase was used by one of the UK's leading literary cultural figures, in a private conversation recently, when they spoke eloquently about the supremacy of "Anglo-Saxon novels" and their impressive command of narrative. My heart sank as I listened, for what became clear to me, in a flash, is that nothing has changed since Victorian England (for some in the literary establishment). Britain (now allied to America) and the English language with its marvellous fiction machine, still rule the waves. I personally find this an uncomfortable position - but when ...

THIS YEAR'S BAFTAS

Last year, Eva Green won the Rising Star award at the Orange BAFTAs - and this year the ceremonies promise to be even more glamorous.  The striking film writers in America silenced the Golden Globes, and look set to do the same for the Oscars, which means London may get a world-class awards night. Eyewear , like all UK citizens, has yet to see some of the films nominated (members get sent copies to watch at home in some instances before general release), but can make some predictions - want to bet? Atonement will likely win Best Film. The Bourne Ultimatum should win Best British Film, though Control may do. The Bourne trilogy was astonishingly good genre work, and has rejuvenated The Bond series in the process, so deserves the kudos. Film Not In The English Language should go to The Lives of Others . Lead Actor will be Daniel Day-Lewis . Lead Actress will be the brilliant Julie Christie , whose work in the superb Canadian film Away From Her was so brave, and moving. Ja...