Skip to main content

Guest Review: Brinton On A New Irish Anthology

Ian Brinton reviews
edited and presented by Joan McBreen

If you are trying to encourage diners to try a newly-opened restaurant which you rate very highly then there is little point in commenting on each dish on the menu since you will end up with one, or at the most two sentences, serving a descriptive purpose that could have been put there by the restaurateur. With this in mind I have decided to give an account of this remarkably fine new anthology by concentrating upon two very different poets whose poetry and prose appears in that ā€˜box where sweets compacted lieā€™.

Geoff Ward, the Vice-Principal of Royal Holloway, London has an article in PN Review192 (March/April 2010) in which he suggests that ā€˜Words can describe, evoke, suggest, delineate, propose, hauntā€”do all manner of thingsā€”except be the thing or feeling or concept to which they refer.ā€™ These words are themselves ghosts of another article written by the same critic in 1989 where he referred to words as ā€˜chasing, describing, shadowing a realityā€™ (Archeus 2). Paul Perryā€™s prose contribution to this new anthology is titled ā€˜Ghostsā€™ and it follows three remarkable poems which range from ā€˜Dawn Sunā€™, a memory of a journey from Budapest to Prague, ā€˜Visiting Hoursā€™, an account of his brotherā€™s illness and hospitalization, and ā€˜The Last Falcon and Small Ordinanceā€™ which recreates the long dead voice of John White, an artist friend of Sir Walter Raleigh who had attempted to found a community in North Carolina in the 1580s. As Perry puts it ā€˜Each poem is ghosted by anotherā€™ and he pays homage to the New York poet Reginald Shepherd who died in 2008 whose work he had been reading whilst composing these three pieces. With that word ā€˜ghostsā€™ in the air it is no surprise to read Perryā€™s comment on his own work:

I want the poems to be a ā€˜field of actionā€™ where a voiceā€™s authority is refuted by the possibilities of contending inflexions and intonations and accents from other presences.

The opening of ā€˜The Last Falcon and Small Ordinanceā€™ confronts us with mystery and loss:

          No one was there when I returned, not a soul
though each one of the settlersā€™ personal effects remained:
some wrapped in dust, some overgrown with grass.
Axe, file, compass. Scuppet, dice and pipe.

Iron pots rusted. Maps and books were spoiled by rain.
Words sank into the soil never to be heard again:
words like love and peace.

The assertive opening line offers us presence: ā€˜No oneā€™ was there, as though the ghosts of those now gone still linger in their belongings, the ā€˜personal effectsā€™. The sense of distance grows with the reference to time passing and this itself moves from the fairly recent (ā€˜wrapped in dustā€™) to the more settled and long-gone atmosphere of ā€˜Iron pots rustedā€™. As the symbols of civilization disintegrate and the words in the books and maps become spoiled the sinking of words into the ground is more than physical, it is as though they dissolve leaving only an echo of what had once been aspiration: ā€˜love and peaceā€™.

ā€˜Visiting Hoursā€™ deals again with ghosts, the legacies of what went before in the history of a troubled Ireland as the poetā€™s brother remains in hospital sifting through the differences between the real and the merely imagined:

                             You talked about how
they kept you against your will, how they
tried to drown you. I turn the radio on,

but it serves no distraction and so I drive,
drive on with the thought that this then is the legacy
of the conflict, or one of its legacies.
That after the bombings, the shootings, the warfare

and ceasefires, after peace and reconciliation,
what we, what some of us, are left with
is a man in a hospital bed, afraid for his life.

ā€˜Drive onā€™ of course because to not do so would be to immerse oneself in the indulgent world of regret that leads to the softness of tears but not the interrogation of the past with which the poem concludes. That said, the final lines tell us that ā€˜no matter how much we beseech you/or each other, weā€™ll never really knowā€™ echoing the movement of Poundā€™s Canto 93:

          There must be incognita
                             and in sea-caves
                             un lume pienā€™ di spiriti
                                      and of memories,
          Shall two know the same in their knowing?

Nuala NĆ­ ChonchĆŗirā€™s three poems possess a warm immediacy, a complete involvement with words making a luscious attempt to bridge that gap between abstract communication and felt experience. The removal of two letters, two symbols, from the word ā€˜foetalā€™ and the inclusion of a repeated ā€˜aā€™ leaves us with ā€˜fatalā€™: the loss of all the ā€˜good workā€™ of growth within the female body:

          we are fastened to our bed
you curl to the curl of me
unshaped to a shape that fits

we sleep, curved into one
and my body begins
the slow, good work

work that weakens me,
balloons me with
both hope and dread

then, after three months,
the heartsick, two-letter slip,
from foetal to fatal

There is a remarkably direct simplicity in this evocation of growth where the ā€˜unshapedā€™ becomes form mirroring the creative act of writing a poem where the concrete and discrete is a measure of what words lose because they are not, as Geoff Ward said, the things to which they refer. That gap between perceiver and perceived, the word and the experience, is delicately woven into the fading of the experience of Narcissus as he ā€˜trumpets his pleasure with himselfā€™ whilst paying homage to his own beauty. This masturbatory act is swiftly followed by the recognition of those blemishes which lie between his dream and the reality:

          His image is mottled by water-scurf and flies,
          like the foxing on an ancient mirror
where mercury and tin have slipped apart.

Nuala NĆ­ ChonchĆŗirā€™s prose accompaniment to her three poems celebrates ā€˜a great freedomā€¦in talking about the body through poetry, choosing the right words and set-up to explore personal and intimate momentsā€™ and there is a passionate sense of ā€˜therenessā€™ about her writing.

This is all just a hint of the menu of twenty-four Irish poets who were born in the last fifty years and I urge readers to taste for themselves the world of delight contained in this anthology, the title of which is taken from Derek Mahon:

          The lines flow from the hand unbidden
          and the hidden source is the watchful heart.

Ian Brinton is a British critic and scholar.  His recent books include Contemporary Poetry from Cambridge, and a collection of essays on JH Prynne.  He reviews regularly for Eyewear.

Comments

Group 8 saidā€¦
Thank you, Ian Brinton. I'm honoured that you chose to zone in on my work in your review of the anthology.
Thank you!
Nuala

Popular posts from this blog

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se....

Poetry vs. Literature

Poetry is, of course, a part of literature. But, increasingly, over the 20th century, it has become marginalised - and, famously, has less of an audience than "before". I think that, when one considers the sort of criticism levelled against Seamus Heaney and "mainstream poetry", by poet-critics like Jeffrey Side , one ought to see the wider context for poetry in the "Anglo-Saxon" world. This phrase was used by one of the UK's leading literary cultural figures, in a private conversation recently, when they spoke eloquently about the supremacy of "Anglo-Saxon novels" and their impressive command of narrative. My heart sank as I listened, for what became clear to me, in a flash, is that nothing has changed since Victorian England (for some in the literary establishment). Britain (now allied to America) and the English language with its marvellous fiction machine, still rule the waves. I personally find this an uncomfortable position - but when ...

THIS YEAR'S BAFTAS

Last year, Eva Green won the Rising Star award at the Orange BAFTAs - and this year the ceremonies promise to be even more glamorous.  The striking film writers in America silenced the Golden Globes, and look set to do the same for the Oscars, which means London may get a world-class awards night. Eyewear , like all UK citizens, has yet to see some of the films nominated (members get sent copies to watch at home in some instances before general release), but can make some predictions - want to bet? Atonement will likely win Best Film. The Bourne Ultimatum should win Best British Film, though Control may do. The Bourne trilogy was astonishingly good genre work, and has rejuvenated The Bond series in the process, so deserves the kudos. Film Not In The English Language should go to The Lives of Others . Lead Actor will be Daniel Day-Lewis . Lead Actress will be the brilliant Julie Christie , whose work in the superb Canadian film Away From Her was so brave, and moving. Ja...