Skip to main content

NEW SPRING POEM INSIRED BY CHARLES MOSELEY'S NEW BOOK

 

The idylls of the fool – 5 sonnets and a coda.

 

Nothing is convenient, and there is never

A good time to be sacrificed to the gods

Of fame’s indifferent gluttony. As

The epitome of the discardable,

I’m not for recycling, a wrapper

For a sweet invented by pacifists,

Now owned by war-makers.

I cavort in a high-ceilinged vacuum,

A dying king’s court is barely ideal

For hijinks. Still, playful idolatries,

Sidelong glances, petty affairs

Pass the time between numb life

And a lavish funeral ceremony

That will bankrupt the next potentate.

 

This kingdom buries their entertainers

With the pharaoh, I’m date-stamped,

And due for a tomb without song.

Strumming my lyre, winking at a princess,

Few if any spy my misfortunes,

Being squat, secondary, an epiphenomenon.

You may think being a cut-up cut-rate

Trickster in motley is a good gig,

Complete with belled cap for a wig,

As I take innumerable swigs of mead,

Have little need for a new role,

But since my Ulysses lolls half-lifeless

On his carved marble throne

Like tyrant winter had come early to tie

 

The spring, let us sing of the decline

Of jolly times, and tropic climes,

For a moribund kingdom is un-droll.

Meanwhile, my gold pile is as much

Use as a eunuch in a queen-sized bed, how to

Buy back those days when I was fab?

The courtiers now are lean, drab, dull;

Useless work takes its toll. We

Should be sailing West, or wherever else

Risk sharpens its claws, seeking out laws

To test; we should be scaling crags

To perforate giant nests, to steal eggs

Golden, rare, unimaginably potent.

It is never too late to steal away,

 

When the tide is prepared to bear

The crew to illustrious vagabond days

Without bonded women, dreams or delay –

Days of riveted action, aroused with instant

Purpose, the rigor of having to do and be.

The having no time to think, just time to see

That what gets done is heroism defined.

Such journeying is uppermost in my mind

As I reflect on my liquidised, drifting, lord.

Oh, how I’d love to throw his piqued chains off,

And bundle him back onboard, for one final

Crazy feast at the high table of mythmaking seas!

Give me uncertain nights, unknown weeks,

To a long-expected peaked doom foretold,

 

Certain as school exams or witless lays.

The old bones of even magisterial kings creak,

But as his eyes meet mine over the cracked rim

Of his overwrought goblet, I can recognise

A signal, even now, to me, his first, best, bard –

Companion still, not gone are the glories –

His wink commands me to plan a last foray,

Hurrah for the escape that defeats death’s doldrums,

We both flee to a future, as panjandrums undulate

To the banging of godless, lazy, imponderable drums.

Only disturb the play! Tear the costumes hard!

Aside, pigeons! Conventional hours obey idiocy.

It is a long madness we eagles choose to assay.

Art’s more interesting if rules bend astray!

 

The sun is sinking nearby villainous behemoths,

A debatably divine abyss, fusing with an occult sigil

That glistens in half-light, lustrous chaos of beyond

What is purely earth-bound, further than testing oceans!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A  poem for my mother, July 15 When she was dying And I was in a different country I dreamt I was there with her Flying over the ocean very quickly, And arriving in the room like a dream And I was a dream, but the meaning was more Than a dream has – it was a moving over time And land, over water, to get love across Fast enough, to be there, before she died, To lean over the small, huddled figure, In the dark, and without bothering her Even with apologies, and be a kiss in the air, A dream of a kiss, or even less, the thought of one, And when I woke, none of this had happened, She was still far distant, and we had not spoken.

Poetry vs. Literature

Poetry is, of course, a part of literature. But, increasingly, over the 20th century, it has become marginalised - and, famously, has less of an audience than "before". I think that, when one considers the sort of criticism levelled against Seamus Heaney and "mainstream poetry", by poet-critics like Jeffrey Side , one ought to see the wider context for poetry in the "Anglo-Saxon" world. This phrase was used by one of the UK's leading literary cultural figures, in a private conversation recently, when they spoke eloquently about the supremacy of "Anglo-Saxon novels" and their impressive command of narrative. My heart sank as I listened, for what became clear to me, in a flash, is that nothing has changed since Victorian England (for some in the literary establishment). Britain (now allied to America) and the English language with its marvellous fiction machine, still rule the waves. I personally find this an uncomfortable position - but when ...

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se....