Skip to main content

playing some chicken, some neck

Film fans may recall the famous James Dean scene where a game of chicken is played - two cars race, and the first who 'blinks' - in this case swerves to avoid death - loses. If neither side 'blinks first' disaster can ensue. This is also called 'brinkmanship politics' - when one appears to risk going to the brink - and when ultimatums get issued, and no one swerves, wars get started. In the case of Brexit, and the UK-EU negotiations, a trade, or even cold, war.

I voted against Brexit, but I wouldn't now. Not after seeing the rude, intransigent, arrogant and controlling ways in which the EU has treated the past few British PMs, but especially Boris Johnson. Johnson went to Brussels the other night to have dinner and talks, and was basically snubbed. Even though 95% of a deal has been hammered out, the 'red lines' remain.

The current odds seem 50% for No Deal. That would be a temporary tragedy and disaster - though not in the long run. But it is forecast to mean a 2% loss to the economy of the UK, which, on top of the current 8% from Covid-19, would mean Britain was one-tenth poorer now than a year ago. It would also mean the pound dropping, and potential food and medical shortages for a few weeks or months.

I can't see where the PM can compromise further. The EU is demanding the UK relinquish control and sovereignty in ways normal trade deals don't ask for. They seem to be still seeking to politically punish the breakaway nation, rather than to creatively envision a new, mutually-potent alliance economically. If Boris Johnson gives in to the EU bullying too much, he would be forced to resign, and the UK would probably not accept the deal anyway.

I believed the EU would blink first, since they have less to lose either way, so more reason to compromise and get this nightmare past us all. But I think they now intend to risk a temporary painful No Deal, to try and hurt the UK, albeit briefly. This is likely more to do with Macron than the Germans.

A deal would be good. But sometimes, no deal is better than a deal that demands more fealty and subservience than a proud and sovereign nation can stomach. I think Churchill would not have swerved, and Johnson may emulate his hero. The EU may drive us all off a cliff in a few weeks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SANTA WEARS EYEWEAR...

Sean Bonney has Died

It is always sad news when a fiercely experimental, committed, and talented poet dies, and so it is that I was sad to learn that Sean Bonney has died, aged 50, in Berlin. Bonney and I often crossed pens online, in the past, and he was no friend to my ideas on poetics. But, he was a poet with conviction and brilliance, and every death is the death of a world. I wish sincere condolences to all who knew him, and loved him, and hope that his poems live on, in memory and print, discussion and study, for years ahead.

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se.  What do I mean by smart?