NEW POEM BY TODD SWIFT - TITLE POEM OF MY FORTHCOMING PAMPHLET?

I am thrilled to have a pamphlet coming out in the first half of 2014 with Alec Newman's wonderful press, KFS. This new poem may be the title poem...

Unfinished Study of a French Girl

Barely there, if at all,

the one that got away,

semi-French,

against the wall,

it’s only air where art

could have been; the stroke

of seconds that slip between

what is night, and what

might be a dream.

Maybe she was a student

who never had to pose again;

a doctor’s patient never seen.

Half invisible, half known,

barely mysterious, just

browning greys, greens.

A face that happens

to remain, almost a boy –

because to form is to decide

only the name

makes her a girl, and even then,

she looks past that decision.

She looks:

she has a bare face. It is a body

that’s undone. Whatever

didn’t happen happened

for a reason, or none;

imagination’s lost address,

a day the umbrella stayed at home

and wasn’t needed

when it failed to rain;

the time the prayer was unsaid

at the graveside

of the passerby in the lane

quick and never dead.

She isn’t quite alive,

but that’s the same with most paint.

Her being fractional

makes her heart beat fainter;

at least it’s possible to hear

her breath out-gathering

like a song one ought to know

but can’t quite place

on the mirror she kept in

her purse on the day

she almost came

to Whistler’s studio.

----

Comments

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart? A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional. Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were. For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ? Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets. But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ? How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular. John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se....

Poetry vs. Literature

Poetry is, of course, a part of literature. But, increasingly, over the 20th century, it has become marginalised - and, famously, has less of an audience than "before". I think that, when one considers the sort of criticism levelled against Seamus Heaney and "mainstream poetry", by poet-critics like Jeffrey Side , one ought to see the wider context for poetry in the "Anglo-Saxon" world. This phrase was used by one of the UK's leading literary cultural figures, in a private conversation recently, when they spoke eloquently about the supremacy of "Anglo-Saxon novels" and their impressive command of narrative. My heart sank as I listened, for what became clear to me, in a flash, is that nothing has changed since Victorian England (for some in the literary establishment). Britain (now allied to America) and the English language with its marvellous fiction machine, still rule the waves. I personally find this an uncomfortable position - but when ...

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and Silence of the Lambs . I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".

E Y E W E A R, THE BLOG - FREEDOM MEANS BEING UNAFRAID TO WRITE WHAT YOU THINK

Search This Blog