MINA WESTBY ON BAD RELIGION

MINA WESTBY SUGGESTS ONE OF THE ALBUMS OF THE YEAR IS BY BAD RELIGION

Who would have thought that when punk band Bad Religion first became known in 1980, thirty-three years later they would still have most of their original band members, and sixteen full-length albums? Much has happened in three decades, but it was the reunion between Greg Graffin and Brett Gurewitz in 2002 that re-signed them with Epitaph; their first record label and returned Bad Religion to their melodic 80’s and 90’s punk rock sound.

A few months ago, Bad Religion released their sixteenth album; True North. The album contains a vast range of punk melodic songs and eloquent lyrics that truly celebrate the history of Bad Religion. Through the song “The Past is Dead” Greg Graffin buries his differences with Gurewitz, but also looks into a better future and sings; ‘let’s focus on tomorrow instead.’

For loyal fans the album is a reminder of the late 80’s and early 90’s through tracks such as, “Fuck You,” and “Hello Cruel World,” which are mementos of 1988’s Suffer and 1990’s Against the Grain among other albums. The return to shorter songs, faster beats and Gurewitz’s melodic guitar solos, Bad Religion seem to have forgotten their previous album The Dissent of Man, which explored a more mainstream pop-punk side of the band.

One disappointment is “Dharma and the Bomb,” sung by Gurewitz. This might be blamed on the unfamiliarity of his voice, but mostly it is the lack of creativity in lyrics. Although dominated by the vocalist’s known guitar solos, Gurewitz’s voice lacks the passion and strength of Graffin whose voice is the trademark of Bad Religion. The lyrics contain mostly a tiring repetition of “Dharma and the Bomb” that sours the good after taste of academically and well-articulated lyrics usually sung by Graffin, thus feeling like an album-filler.

It is, however good to hear that they have yet to give up the fight towards social and political justice. In “Robin Hood in Reverse” the social commentary and questioning of the nature of God is portrayed in ‘Here’s the church; there’s the steeple/ Open the door, corporations are people,’ and continued in a catchy repetition of ‘Let’s say we try to get this right/ Said the plutocrat to Jesus Christ.’ As always, Gurewitz and Graffin’s combination of commentary lyrics and strong voice manage to create yet another punk rock masterpiece. Another song that is an absolute must-hear is “Dept. Of False Hope” where they praise the will for survival amongst the working class, while criticising government action. The fast drum beats by Brooks Wackerman and Graffin’s fast sung words effectively create a charismatic sound; which truly shows the colors of the band.

If the rumours are true, after what Graffin said during a tour in 2012, that the band will ‘join the navy, do honest work,’ I believe many will see True North in the short list of their Bad Religion discography. Their ability to maintain a sound that has been loved, and will be loved for many more decades, has given Greg Graffin and Bad Religion a particular punk rock image that many, me included, will dearly miss. True North will therefore always be seen as a celebration of their achievements, and perhaps a perfect ending to a long and successful career.

Mina Westby has a BA in Vreative Writing from Kingston University.

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart? A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional. Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were. For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ? Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets. But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ? How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular. John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se....

Poetry vs. Literature

Poetry is, of course, a part of literature. But, increasingly, over the 20th century, it has become marginalised - and, famously, has less of an audience than "before". I think that, when one considers the sort of criticism levelled against Seamus Heaney and "mainstream poetry", by poet-critics like Jeffrey Side , one ought to see the wider context for poetry in the "Anglo-Saxon" world. This phrase was used by one of the UK's leading literary cultural figures, in a private conversation recently, when they spoke eloquently about the supremacy of "Anglo-Saxon novels" and their impressive command of narrative. My heart sank as I listened, for what became clear to me, in a flash, is that nothing has changed since Victorian England (for some in the literary establishment). Britain (now allied to America) and the English language with its marvellous fiction machine, still rule the waves. I personally find this an uncomfortable position - but when ...

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and Silence of the Lambs . I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".

E Y E W E A R, THE BLOG - FREEDOM MEANS BEING UNAFRAID TO WRITE WHAT YOU THINK

Search This Blog