Skip to main content

Guest Review: Pople On Boran



Ian Pople reviews

Pat Boran

The Next Life

Dedalus Press, £10.00



There is an interesting tension in this book between its overall opulence (it’s 100 pages in length and its approaches and techniques just as varied) and the often beguiling simplicity of its best poems.  In part that tension is controlled by Boran’s seeming effortlessness - Boran is a very fine technician - and it is also controlled by Boran’s clear-sighted perspective on the world. 



To my mind, the best poems in this book are where Boran responds with dextrous and beguiling simplicity to the things he has seen. As in ‘Skipping’, in which a girl is portrayed skipping outside his house for most of the morning.  In the course of the morning, the girl is ‘now with a friend, now with a whole gang of friends,/now on her own.’ The poem then moves into a single sentence which last the remaining twelve lines of the poem.  In the trajectory of the syntax, Boran moves the reader through a precise realization of how the girl is skipping, through attention to skipping rhymes ‘no small girl ever really understands’, through a visit from the ice-cream van, to the adroit sense of the girl’s at-one-ness with the act of skipping.  Such is Boran’s dexterity with syntax that the reader is calmly and firmly held in the movement of both line and narrative. 



Elsewhere, Boran has the time and control to weave a much more metaphysical construction.  In ‘A Dog’, for example, Boran speculates not so much on humanity’s relationship with the dog, but on the way the dog witnesses the worlds that humans place them in, ‘…these damp-smelling angels/who suffer our moods and our scoldings/and still, in the end - / the table cleared and the lights turned off -/ who lead us out one final time/to stand in darkness/ and wait, looking up/like shepherds beneath/the canopy of stars.’  In Boran’s poem, dogs have an unusual and beguiling equality to humans, gently and unfailingly tolerating the weaknesses and foibles of their human ‘masters’. 



Such a comment might be true of Boran’s writing; though that would be to characterise him as puppy-eyed and, possibly sentimental. Boran has a loving, almost mystical acceptance of the world he finds around him.  But Boran’s technical control is so firm that he is never sentimental even whilst exploring sentiment.  There is a wholly enviable inevitability about Boran’s poetry.



Ian Pople

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CLIVE WILMER'S THOM GUNN SELECTED POEMS IS A MUST-READ

THAT HANDSOME MAN  A PERSONAL BRIEF REVIEW BY TODD SWIFT I could lie and claim Larkin, Yeats , or Dylan Thomas most excited me as a young poet, or even Pound or FT Prince - but the truth be told, it was Thom Gunn I first and most loved when I was young. Precisely, I fell in love with his first two collections, written under a formalist, Elizabethan ( Fulke Greville mainly), Yvor Winters triad of influences - uniquely fused with an interest in homerotica, pop culture ( Brando, Elvis , motorcycles). His best poem 'On The Move' is oddly presented here without the quote that began it usually - Man, you gotta go - which I loved. Gunn was - and remains - so thrilling, to me at least, because so odd. His elegance, poise, and intelligence is all about display, about surface - but the surface of a panther, who ripples with strength beneath the skin. With Gunn, you dressed to have sex. Or so I thought.  Because I was queer (I maintain the right to lay claim to that

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se.  What do I mean by smart?

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and  Silence of the Lambs .  I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".