Skip to main content

Starter's Pistol, Pistorius' End

Have you seen many murderers in public?  I hadn't, until I saw Oscar Pistorius run, at the 2012 Summer Olympics, in London.  At the time, like almost everyone else in the stadium and by extension the world, I stood and cheered, marvelling at his speed, grace, courage and physical charisma.  He was the great blade runner, a hero to children and adults, and one of the major sporting figures of the age.  That was then - six months ago more or less.  Half a year makes a big difference.

Now, the day after Valentine's Day, and the cruel irony is not lost on anyone, at only 26 years of age, he stands accused of murdering his girlfriend.  Given that she was a beautiful swimwear model and covergirl, and he a millionaire icon of the new South Africa, it is hard to imagine a more swift or cruel fall from national and international grace in terms of celebrity infamy - the fall is truly Olympian.  With four shots to the head and body, Oscar has gone from a great to a hateful figure - just another brutal selfish man taking out his narcissistic rage against a lovely woman.  He joins a few superstars who have murdered their partners - William S. Burroughs and OJ Simpson come to mind.  Hero to Zero comes to mind.

Less than zero, though - because the more we read, the more we realise that Oscar was a time bomb - and a victim himself of the violent gun culture at the heart of his time and place.  It turns out this self-styled "bullet" would often wake at night and fire off clips in the dark.  That he had a machine gun in his home.  That he was obsessed with security.  And that, rich and privileged from birth, despite his disability, he was a man prone to domestic abuse, perhaps a "womaniser" as some sources have suggested.  All we saw, or wanted to see, was a handsome para-athlete.

To paraphrase a famous phrase from last year: is it okay to hate a disabled person?  Is it okay to say they are stupid, or perhaps even wicked?  Is it okay to look squarely at someone with a disability and see what was really always there - a spoiled, petulant, angry, alpha male.  Who could snuff a life out faster than he could run 100 metres.

Comments

bertzpoet said…
Perhaps on steroids...
To be fair the man strongly denies murdering his partner 'in the strongest possible terms' and his family, through his spokesperson, have released a statement to this effect.

We will have to wait and see what the evidence is. It's very premature to start blabbing off about him being this that and the other without knowing anything. One of the worst things in the world is to be accused of a murder you haven't committed, and then having every stranger with an internet connection assume you did it and then pontificate about you, a person wholly unknown to them.

Cut the guy a bit of slack, I say. Wait till his trial.
EYEWEAR said…
Well, he may well be innocent. However, it isn't looking good at the moment. The shots were fired through a bathroom door at 3 am in the morning after neighbours heard a loud dispute between a man and a woman; there was no security breach and no other person involved. We have seen too many angry-man-kills-woman incidents I think to have to suspend our credulity entirely for the sake of the polite fiction of legal innocence. Unless a credible alternative is advanced, it seems reasonable to assume, that, sadly, the man is an alleged killer.

Popular posts from this blog

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se.  What do I mean by smart?

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and  Silence of the Lambs .  I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".

THE SWIFT REPORT 2023

I am writing this post without much enthusiasm, but with a sense of duty. This blog will be 20 years old soon, and though I rarely post here anymore, I owe it some attention. Of course in 2023, "Swift" now means one thing only, Taylor Swift, the billionaire musician. Gone are the days when I was asked if I was related to Jonathan Swift. The pre-eminent cultural Swift is now alive and TIME PERSON OF THE YEAR. There is no point in belabouring the obvious with delay: 2023 was a low-point in the low annals of human history - war, invasion, murder, in too many nations. Hate, division, the collapse of what truth is, exacerbated by advances in AI that may or may not prove apocalyptic, while global warming still seems to threaten the near-future safety of humanity. It's been deeply depressing. The world lost some wonderful poets, actors, musicians, and writers this year, as it often does. Two people I knew and admired greatly, Ian Ferrier and Kevin Higgins, poets and organise