Skip to main content

Guest Review: Hirschhorn On Harlow


Midwest Ritual Burning
by Morgan Harlow

American poet Morgan Harlow’s debut collection produces a compelling variant on what is called ‘experimental poetry’. In my earlier review of Charles Bernstein’s Attack of the Difficult Poems I noted that Bernstein defines the term ‘difficult poem’ as one with abstruse vocabulary and syntax, hard to appreciate on first readings, yet affecting the reader’s imagination – all of which makes “some readers feel stupid.”  Not so this collection. Although many of Harlow’s poems do disrupt syntax, play with the geography of the poem on the page, and privilege sound over sense, the muscular precision of the words bears down with chilling impact on the reader.  She respects her audience. Here is the title poem in its entirety:

            Davy and Min are
            burning hooves and horns
            raked into a pile near the drive going up to the barn.
            Davy scatters a little of the ash rich in calcium
            to the chickens and Min tips a quarter turn of the shovel
            onto the ground beneath
            a belated daffodil
            gotten through the brush
            where the last sticks of firewood
            left over from the winter
            splinter and curl
            in the light of the sun.

At first glance it’s a bit of rural lyric, an American Gothic couple fertilizing their patch. But four words, burning hooves and horns, suddenly transport the reader into a parallel Homeric universe, behemoths roasting on the beach, burnt offerings to the gods, ritual.  Note moreover the opposition of these beasts to a little ash, a hesitant quarter turn of the shovel, the lost daffodil, and remnants of tinder.

Following Emily Dickinson’s directive to “Tell all the Truth but tell it slant --/ Success in Circuit lies,” Man Effigy Burial Mound (a national monument in Iowa) tells of a couple driving across one of the large 12,000 year-old American Indian mounds, the woman addressed by a brusque male voice  (“I didn’t see until you pointed it out to me….Cut through the gut is what you said”). But they are having an affair (“Your wife stayed home…. When we are out, your wife’s at home”); one with a destructive ending shown by two perfect metaphors: “She contemplates the Ice Age and the crumbling glacial loam.”

Four of Harlow’s poems draw on four paintings by Joan MirĂł. One of the early surrealist painters, MirĂł soon developed a unique experimental style of fantastic but discrete arrangements of colours and shapes (called ‘pictorial signs’ by art critics). Harlow reflects on his work in Poem Beseeching an End to Social Darwinism, a Meditation on Painting, 1933, by Joan MirĂł. The poem counterfactually gives a brief straightforward prose-speech pleading for human comity: “We must seek to understand, and not compete against, each other….Do not engage in life as though it were a contest…”  Is she being ironic? I think not: the painting shows bright, furious reds, black and white forms, with two humanoid shapes opposing one another, and a bemused man-in-the-crescent moon looking down on the scene. Harlow is unafraid of feeling or political gesture.   Neither was MirĂł: his Man and Woman in Front of a Pile of Excrement, 1935 – lurid, sexual – is said to be a foreboding of the coming Spanish Civil War. Harlow uses the work to plea again for civilized discourse instead of violence:

            That which is elemental, the color red, amoebas, nakedness,
            is most alien to us. We must clothe it as best we can through
            language, art and law. To greet it plain is to risk stepping off
            the cliff into darkness.

Like MirĂł, Harlow achieves her best work with elements: discrete, distinct and parsimonious; a muscular eccentricity. There is a risk to writing in fragments – Harlow’s longest poem, Elegy to a Higher Love, is made of fourteen such; but to judge the work this way would be like focusing on just one portion of an abstract painting instead of standing back to see the whole.

I can see how the painter would illustrate Harlow’s Park Statue:

            If the spirit of their fallen Colonel be embodied in this bronze,
            must not the infantry troops he watched over be these flowers,
            each of them keen to the whip and snap of the flag on this
            perfect summer’s day?

Summer days turn into autumn, then winter, yet the fragile flowers still give obeisance to the obtuse statue. Note that there are no clichéd pigeons about.

Harlow’s ars poetica in The New stands as a plea for poetry in human life:
 “…was poetry ever not real/ distinct from the world and from love? Or/ / was it always always lived,/ with a sigh and a breath/ and a cry?”   Harlow affirms ‘always’ in this impressive first collection. 

This is a debut as well for Eyewear Publishing.  The book comes in hard cover with a fine back-sleeve photo of the poet overlaid by testimonials; the house-style front- sleeve of this and forthcoming issues is in bold colour.  One looks forward to further collections.
 
Norbert Hirschhorn is a poet and physician. His most recent collection is Monastery of the Moon (Dar al Jadeed, Beirut, 2012). See his website: .

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se.  What do I mean by smart?

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and  Silence of the Lambs .  I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".

THE SWIFT REPORT 2023

I am writing this post without much enthusiasm, but with a sense of duty. This blog will be 20 years old soon, and though I rarely post here anymore, I owe it some attention. Of course in 2023, "Swift" now means one thing only, Taylor Swift, the billionaire musician. Gone are the days when I was asked if I was related to Jonathan Swift. The pre-eminent cultural Swift is now alive and TIME PERSON OF THE YEAR. There is no point in belabouring the obvious with delay: 2023 was a low-point in the low annals of human history - war, invasion, murder, in too many nations. Hate, division, the collapse of what truth is, exacerbated by advances in AI that may or may not prove apocalyptic, while global warming still seems to threaten the near-future safety of humanity. It's been deeply depressing. The world lost some wonderful poets, actors, musicians, and writers this year, as it often does. Two people I knew and admired greatly, Ian Ferrier and Kevin Higgins, poets and organise