Skip to main content

Love?: The New J-Lo


James Christopher Sheppard reviews
Love?
by Jennifer Lopez

Following a prolonged break from topping the charts, Jennifer Lopez returns with her seventh studio album and the first since 2007, Love? First single, ‘On the Floor’ smashed it’s way to the top of the UK singles chart last week, knocking Adele’s massive hit ‘Someone Like You’ off the chart summit, which has raised excitement about the new material. Here’s how the leaked tracks are sounding so far.

‘On the Floor’ (featuring Pitbull)

What is it about Pitbull? He seems to crop up in the most obscure places, having been featured on Enrique Iglesias, Alexandra Burke and Usher tracks all in the past year, to name just a few. No matter how unlikely the pairings seem to be, however, it seems to guarantee a hit, and this is no exception. An appealing dance track, incorporating the sounds of Kaoma’s 1989 hit ‘Lambada’, the J-Lo track ‘Waiting for Tonight’ and something that screams the latest Sugababes work with Red One, who also produced this, the only thing this lacks is originality.

‘Good Hit’

‘I got that good hit’ Jennifer sings on the intro. If Lopez is trying to secure her place back at the top of the ghetto divas, it might be worth being less censored and actually using ‘shit’. With a great beat, this track holds some promise, but is completely ruined by the never-ending auto-tune on Jennifer’s vocals. It literally does not stop and trashes what would otherwise be a decent track.

‘I’m Into You’ (featuring Lil Wayne)

Second single from the album, ‘I’m Into You’ continues the Latin-tinged summer beat already and could well be as big as ‘On the Floor’. The only real problem is the very repetitive boring chorus ‘I’m into you, I’m into you, I’m into you, yeah, yeah yeah’. Really?

‘What is Love’

The melody is almost a slowed down version of ‘On the Floor’, yet still succeeds in feeling fresher that both ‘Good Hit’ and ‘I’m Into You’. It’s refreshing to hear Lopez actually sing and hear some emotion behind the vocal. No auto-tune and no guest rapper, this feels more authentically J-Lo. A breezy, relatable song, that hears a girl longing for love. A triumph- more like this please Jenny from the block.

‘Run the World’ (featuring The-Dream)

This tempo is where Lopez appears to be at ease and effortless. Charming and breezy, ‘Run the World’ is destined to played at all the barbeques this summer.

‘Until it Beats No More’

A pleasant enough ballad at first, but the verses are better than the chorus. Let’s face it, Lopez can sing, but her range isn’t great and she is not a belter. This song is too big for her. As the song progresses, Jennifer’s voice fails her more and more and actually becomes quite hard to listen to.

‘One Love’

The thrillingly boring and uninspired title describes the song pretty well. No amount of synths can excite anyone here. Skip.

‘Villain’

Oh dear God. Within the first minute it’s established that some over excited vocal arranger had the bright idea to make the verses sound completely out of tune. Some kind of attempt at sounding dark and brooding and sexy… Awful. This is more 1998 than 2011. And bad 1998 at that.

‘Starting Over’

Sounding remarkably flat, ‘Starting Over’ is not a strong point on the album. Featuring messy production that doesn’t come together at all and a cat-strangling chorus of ‘nobody wants to be the one breaking up’, this is possibly the worst track from Love?

Verdict
Love?  is a far cry from the J-Lo of old. With only three or four fairly good tracks so far, this looks set to be another disappointing release from Lopez, and may even be the least cohesive selection of tracks she has ever released. Stick to your glittering movie career Jen, we love to see you shine.

Love? is due for release on 2nd May 2011 on Mercury Records

James Christopher Sheppard is a London based freelance writer. For more of his music journalism, poetry and blogging, visit his website Intellectual Intercourse. http://www.jameschristophersheppard.wordpress.com

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Poetry Pleases! said…
Dear James

I don't know about J-Lo but I was seduced by the hype surrounding Jessie J's debut album into buying a copy. Halfway through I realised that I had made a dreadful mistake as there was only one track (Do it Like a Dude) that I actually liked. Luckily I had hung onto the receipt and this morning was able to exchange it for Britney's latest. I am never going to listen to pop hype again. In my experience the best place for honest and balanced reviews of CDs is the review section of Amazon.co.uk

Best wishes from Simon
Mon Apr 11, 02:23:00 pm 2011
Anonymous said…
Hi Simon,

I've not yet heard the Jessie J album, but the singles from it haven't grabbed me yet. It's always worth checking out people's reviews, for sure. I reviewed the new Britney album a few weeks ago. I didn't mind it- it is certainly an awful lot better than this from J-Lo!

Thanks for reading!
James
Sat Apr 16, 04:54:00 pm 2011
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se....
3 comments
Read more

Poetry vs. Literature

Poetry is, of course, a part of literature. But, increasingly, over the 20th century, it has become marginalised - and, famously, has less of an audience than "before". I think that, when one considers the sort of criticism levelled against Seamus Heaney and "mainstream poetry", by poet-critics like Jeffrey Side , one ought to see the wider context for poetry in the "Anglo-Saxon" world. This phrase was used by one of the UK's leading literary cultural figures, in a private conversation recently, when they spoke eloquently about the supremacy of "Anglo-Saxon novels" and their impressive command of narrative. My heart sank as I listened, for what became clear to me, in a flash, is that nothing has changed since Victorian England (for some in the literary establishment). Britain (now allied to America) and the English language with its marvellous fiction machine, still rule the waves. I personally find this an uncomfortable position - but when ...
15 comments
Read more

THIS YEAR'S BAFTAS

Last year, Eva Green won the Rising Star award at the Orange BAFTAs - and this year the ceremonies promise to be even more glamorous.  The striking film writers in America silenced the Golden Globes, and look set to do the same for the Oscars, which means London may get a world-class awards night. Eyewear , like all UK citizens, has yet to see some of the films nominated (members get sent copies to watch at home in some instances before general release), but can make some predictions - want to bet? Atonement will likely win Best Film. The Bourne Ultimatum should win Best British Film, though Control may do. The Bourne trilogy was astonishingly good genre work, and has rejuvenated The Bond series in the process, so deserves the kudos. Film Not In The English Language should go to The Lives of Others . Lead Actor will be Daniel Day-Lewis . Lead Actress will be the brilliant Julie Christie , whose work in the superb Canadian film Away From Her was so brave, and moving. Ja...
Post a Comment
Read more