Skip to main content

Guest Review: Hirschhorn On Harlow


Midwest Ritual Burning
by Morgan Harlow

American poet Morgan Harlow’s debut collection produces a compelling variant on what is called ‘experimental poetry’. In my earlier review of Charles Bernstein’s Attack of the Difficult Poems I noted that Bernstein defines the term ‘difficult poem’ as one with abstruse vocabulary and syntax, hard to appreciate on first readings, yet affecting the reader’s imagination – all of which makes “some readers feel stupid.”  Not so this collection. Although many of Harlow’s poems do disrupt syntax, play with the geography of the poem on the page, and privilege sound over sense, the muscular precision of the words bears down with chilling impact on the reader.  She respects her audience. Here is the title poem in its entirety:

            Davy and Min are
            burning hooves and horns
            raked into a pile near the drive going up to the barn.
            Davy scatters a little of the ash rich in calcium
            to the chickens and Min tips a quarter turn of the shovel
            onto the ground beneath
            a belated daffodil
            gotten through the brush
            where the last sticks of firewood
            left over from the winter
            splinter and curl
            in the light of the sun.

At first glance it’s a bit of rural lyric, an American Gothic couple fertilizing their patch. But four words, burning hooves and horns, suddenly transport the reader into a parallel Homeric universe, behemoths roasting on the beach, burnt offerings to the gods, ritual.  Note moreover the opposition of these beasts to a little ash, a hesitant quarter turn of the shovel, the lost daffodil, and remnants of tinder.

Following Emily Dickinson’s directive to “Tell all the Truth but tell it slant --/ Success in Circuit lies,” Man Effigy Burial Mound (a national monument in Iowa) tells of a couple driving across one of the large 12,000 year-old American Indian mounds, the woman addressed by a brusque male voice  (“I didn’t see until you pointed it out to me….Cut through the gut is what you said”). But they are having an affair (“Your wife stayed home…. When we are out, your wife’s at home”); one with a destructive ending shown by two perfect metaphors: “She contemplates the Ice Age and the crumbling glacial loam.”

Four of Harlow’s poems draw on four paintings by Joan Miró. One of the early surrealist painters, Miró soon developed a unique experimental style of fantastic but discrete arrangements of colours and shapes (called ‘pictorial signs’ by art critics). Harlow reflects on his work in Poem Beseeching an End to Social Darwinism, a Meditation on Painting, 1933, by Joan Miró. The poem counterfactually gives a brief straightforward prose-speech pleading for human comity: “We must seek to understand, and not compete against, each other….Do not engage in life as though it were a contest…”  Is she being ironic? I think not: the painting shows bright, furious reds, black and white forms, with two humanoid shapes opposing one another, and a bemused man-in-the-crescent moon looking down on the scene. Harlow is unafraid of feeling or political gesture.   Neither was Miró: his Man and Woman in Front of a Pile of Excrement, 1935 – lurid, sexual – is said to be a foreboding of the coming Spanish Civil War. Harlow uses the work to plea again for civilized discourse instead of violence:

            That which is elemental, the color red, amoebas, nakedness,
            is most alien to us. We must clothe it as best we can through
            language, art and law. To greet it plain is to risk stepping off
            the cliff into darkness.

Like Miró, Harlow achieves her best work with elements: discrete, distinct and parsimonious; a muscular eccentricity. There is a risk to writing in fragments – Harlow’s longest poem, Elegy to a Higher Love, is made of fourteen such; but to judge the work this way would be like focusing on just one portion of an abstract painting instead of standing back to see the whole.

I can see how the painter would illustrate Harlow’s Park Statue:

            If the spirit of their fallen Colonel be embodied in this bronze,
            must not the infantry troops he watched over be these flowers,
            each of them keen to the whip and snap of the flag on this
            perfect summer’s day?

Summer days turn into autumn, then winter, yet the fragile flowers still give obeisance to the obtuse statue. Note that there are no clichéd pigeons about.

Harlow’s ars poetica in The New stands as a plea for poetry in human life:
 “…was poetry ever not real/ distinct from the world and from love? Or/ / was it always always lived,/ with a sigh and a breath/ and a cry?”   Harlow affirms ‘always’ in this impressive first collection. 

This is a debut as well for Eyewear Publishing.  The book comes in hard cover with a fine back-sleeve photo of the poet overlaid by testimonials; the house-style front- sleeve of this and forthcoming issues is in bold colour.  One looks forward to further collections.
 
Norbert Hirschhorn is a poet and physician. His most recent collection is Monastery of the Moon (Dar al Jadeed, Beirut, 2012). See his website: .

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AMERICA PSYCHO

According to the latest CBS, ABC, etc, polls, Clinton is still likely to beat Trump - by percentile odds of 66% to 33% and change. But the current popular vote is much closer, probably tied with the error of margin, around 44% each. Trump has to win more key battleground states to win, and may not - but he is ahead in Florida...

We will all know, in a week, whether we live in a world gone madder, or just relatively mad.

While it seems likely calmer heads will prevail, the recent Brexit win shows that polls can mislead, especially when one of the options is considered a bit embarrassing, rude or even racist - and Trump qualifies for these, at least.

If 42-45% of Americans admit they would vote for Trump, what does that say about the ones not so vocal? For surely, they must be there, as well. Some of the undecided will slide, and more likely they will slide to the wilder and more exciting fringe candidate. As may the libertarians.

Eyewear predicts that Trump will just about manage to win th…

DANGER, MAN

Like a crazed killer clown, whether we are thrilled, horrified, shocked, or angered (or all of these) by Donald Trump, we cannot claim to be rid of him just yet. He bestrides the world stage like a silverback gorilla (according to one British thug), or a bad analogy, but he is there, a figure, no longer of fun, but grave concern.

There has long been a history of misogynistic behaviour in American gangster culture - one thinks of the grapefruit in the face in The Public Enemy, or Sinatra throwing a woman out of his hotel room and later commenting he didn't realise there was a pool below to break her fall, or the polluted womb in Pacino'sScarface... and of course, some gangsta rap is also sexist.  American culture has a difficult way with handling the combined aspects of male power, and male privilege, that, especially in heteronormative capitalist enclaves, where money/pussy both become grabbable, reified objects and objectives (The Wolf of Wall Street for instance), an ugly fus…

OSCAR SMOSHCAR

The Oscars - Academy Awards officially - were once huge cultural events - in 1975, Frank Sinatra, Sammy Davis Jr, Shirley MacLaineandBob Hope co-hosted, for example - and Best Picture noms included The Conversation and Chinatown. Godfather Part 2 won. Last two years, movies titled Birdman and Spotlight won, and the hosts and those films are retrospectively minor, trifling. This year, some important, resonant films are up for consideration - including Hidden Figures and Moonlight, two favourites of this blog. Viola Davis and Denzel Washington will hopefully win for their sterling performances in Fences. However, La La Land - the most superficial and empty Best Picture contender since Gigi in 1959 (which beat Vertigo) - could smite all comers, and render this year's awards historically trivial, even idiotic.

The Oscars often opt for safe, optimistic films, or safe, pessimistic films, that are usually about white men (less often, white women) finding their path to doing the right thin…