Skip to main content

Poem for my mother, who read me Frost first

Poem for my mother, who read me Frost first


The whole thing is the fact we’re not okay,

The thing and the rest of it are the same corollary

It has the name of all and several sectors, sprayed,

Like lavender oil or some arcane graffiti, in display –

We’re meshed up with the disappearing decay, gone

 

Like Spengler into the madhouse there, a fairground

Array that would make Ian Curtis moan this is the way

Not to go – we’re AWOL on a precipice for Cruise

To cycle off, in cyclone, in perpetuity, as if to say,

The ground is up above, the twister is also there,

 

And I don’t care who knows the plans of the Chief

Who holds the cards intact, the hand betrays

The eye that bulges from battle affray, from fearsome

Blown debris, it’s not a good time to be staying out late,

Or even indoors, mate, stay somewhere else, sick bay?

 

The tree that hid us from the storm has been struck twice

First by light’s finger, then by the malefactor known as ice.

As Elvis C. bleated in his nasal best, it’s beyond belief, worse,

Because see here, there’s Freudian anxiety at play, plus,

When we step inside, we see the Disneyfied idea of our selves

 

As interior lampoons; but the lamp’s a false dawn,

As Diogenes, and his ilk, have instructed, on and on and on.

All I want is my mommy, but she’s got cancer of the entirety,

Nor would a cure be possible, madam, in this perplexity of bone,

Skin; I ache from aching at the ache of dying in my someone else.



JULY 11, 2024, LONDON

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se....

Poetry vs. Literature

Poetry is, of course, a part of literature. But, increasingly, over the 20th century, it has become marginalised - and, famously, has less of an audience than "before". I think that, when one considers the sort of criticism levelled against Seamus Heaney and "mainstream poetry", by poet-critics like Jeffrey Side , one ought to see the wider context for poetry in the "Anglo-Saxon" world. This phrase was used by one of the UK's leading literary cultural figures, in a private conversation recently, when they spoke eloquently about the supremacy of "Anglo-Saxon novels" and their impressive command of narrative. My heart sank as I listened, for what became clear to me, in a flash, is that nothing has changed since Victorian England (for some in the literary establishment). Britain (now allied to America) and the English language with its marvellous fiction machine, still rule the waves. I personally find this an uncomfortable position - but when ...

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and  Silence of the Lambs .  I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".