Poem day before my 56th birthday

Poem day before my 56^th birthday

The perfect poem is out of sight, around the bend,
Part optic fibre cables being laid underground,
Part cherry blossoms staggeringly impermanent,
Outrageous as Stravinsky music in the air,

Part finely shattered, gold-re-joined, Satsuma vase,
Part so-brazenly broken national laws,
Part of the world as it moves around other worlds,
Part so personal it embarrasses even itself,

Part cruelly stern as a witchfinder general,
Part wonderfully iconoclastic as a witch’s brew,
Part cat sleeping, part cat leaping, part paw,
Part mouse that got away; part all the pain

We ever knew, and then some, and then some more;
The treasure under the floorboards under the stairs,
Is being written for someone else’s birthday,
By someone else; won’t ever be written, to be true,

Because perfection is the enemy of any friend
To what is troubling to imagine, harder to rephrase.
That won’t stop me from summoning this one up,
Stolen from the mystery shelf where language lies.

In my poem I’d need a bit of Canada, but not just snow,
Some parental turmoil and all that sorrow, saved
Somehow by compassion; sex of younger days, reviewed
By religion, marriage and sickness, the bumbling through.

Camaraderie bordering on true love, travel to odd climes;
The flats in Budapest, Paris and London, over-booked,
Overlooking trees; streets with prams not ever ours;
The hours, the hours, of forgiving and consoling powers.

APRIL 7, 2022

Comments

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart? A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional. Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were. For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ? Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets. But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ? How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular. John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se....

Poetry vs. Literature

Poetry is, of course, a part of literature. But, increasingly, over the 20th century, it has become marginalised - and, famously, has less of an audience than "before". I think that, when one considers the sort of criticism levelled against Seamus Heaney and "mainstream poetry", by poet-critics like Jeffrey Side , one ought to see the wider context for poetry in the "Anglo-Saxon" world. This phrase was used by one of the UK's leading literary cultural figures, in a private conversation recently, when they spoke eloquently about the supremacy of "Anglo-Saxon novels" and their impressive command of narrative. My heart sank as I listened, for what became clear to me, in a flash, is that nothing has changed since Victorian England (for some in the literary establishment). Britain (now allied to America) and the English language with its marvellous fiction machine, still rule the waves. I personally find this an uncomfortable position - but when ...

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and Silence of the Lambs . I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".

E Y E W E A R, THE BLOG - FREEDOM MEANS BEING UNAFRAID TO WRITE WHAT YOU THINK

Search This Blog