Skip to main content

new poem

PRE-OP SPRING DAY IN MARCH 2022


It's been too long till spring -

    is false. It's here, in time.

just as it always was, a thing

    like a wheel or a poem, rhyme;


that is, it has its schedule,

    takes its turn, happens as it does.

Still, the sun climbing trees, I'm full

    to bursting with light's to and fros.


All is event, like thought, argument,

    war or love; like a pacemaker

device, implant I fear to have, spent

    hours returning like a general to their


tent. It's life itself that surveys

    maps, terrain, future battlefields.

Nothing less than this glorious day

    of impractical miracle-sun, big yields,


obliterates memories of lockdown, shelters

    underground, darkness that preys

on mind and heart-valves, those skelters

    that turn about like unlovers, May's


dancers around the burgeoning pole.

    I'm alive, for now, pre-op, thoughtful,

re-reading The School of Donne, again,

    to be reminded of a deceased friend


to look at a brilliant mind as a season

of circuity, shock, and curative reason.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se....

Poetry vs. Literature

Poetry is, of course, a part of literature. But, increasingly, over the 20th century, it has become marginalised - and, famously, has less of an audience than "before". I think that, when one considers the sort of criticism levelled against Seamus Heaney and "mainstream poetry", by poet-critics like Jeffrey Side , one ought to see the wider context for poetry in the "Anglo-Saxon" world. This phrase was used by one of the UK's leading literary cultural figures, in a private conversation recently, when they spoke eloquently about the supremacy of "Anglo-Saxon novels" and their impressive command of narrative. My heart sank as I listened, for what became clear to me, in a flash, is that nothing has changed since Victorian England (for some in the literary establishment). Britain (now allied to America) and the English language with its marvellous fiction machine, still rule the waves. I personally find this an uncomfortable position - but when ...

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and  Silence of the Lambs .  I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".