Skip to main content

NEW EASTER POEM, ON ANGLICANISM AND JESUS

Cathy’s Clown

 

‘I die each night I hear this sound / here he comes that’s Cathy’s clown’

 

As the Anglican communion withers on the vine,

After centuries of Brexit-like post-papal decline,

Britain finds its new age built on a looser soil,

 

Belief brittle, online, feckless and vainly personal,

As if the idea of a higher being was a crass magic

That the Francis Crick ‘team’ had finally licked

 

With an ace crackerjack vaccine that mainly works

When it infuriates the French, Germans and Turks…

What other church is overseen by a former oil exec

 

Who admits to often being a bit depressed, atheistic?

It’s difficult running a side-split faith organisation

Derived from a randy king’s desire for penetration

 

In multiple ways not approved of by the testaments –

Only in England could ‘bells and smells’ be meant

In the best possible way, could priests be somewhat gay,

 

Yet told not to sleep together, in direct contrast, say,

To their founding tediously ruthless King Henry;

And yet, at Easter, even this motley, torn committee,

 

By definition mediocre, part-human, half-manticore,

Has to pause to reflect on the past four quarters,

And recognise that saving billions to shut vestry doors

 

Is a downbeat from love the meek, ‘focus on’ the poorest;

The trees have walked out of the forest, leaving a lone

Branch, on which waits a BAME uneducated allophone,

 

Who represents the structural flaws in every system,

For it is not our fault to sin; the seam leads to him –

We can unravel our corporate suits of tailored silk,

 

It does no harm, he cries to us, spilling graceful milk,

It’s an anachronistic message that doesn’t poll well,

It ‘turns off’ the Tory libertarian, the woke millennial –

 

No one wants to be told what to do, especially by a man

Claiming odd truths that don’t hate on the Romans.

Pay your taxes, never judge a sexual deviant, or leper –


It’s unpalatably kind, cowering, no lion, a low purr –

A belly rolled over, a shrug, a sort of giving up to higher

Laws, forces, another self or mind, as if to forgive liars,


As if to sue for peace, bury hatchets, let complaint go.

Not as if, that is what it is, a way to not become fixated credo

Above the moment’s compassionate facts on the ground.

 

Which is why, after lifting to be bled out he made a sound,

A sad death-rattle, that slowly, silently, then louder still,

Broke half the world open as a boulder shifted uphill.

 

April 1, 2021

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CLIVE WILMER'S THOM GUNN SELECTED POEMS IS A MUST-READ

THAT HANDSOME MAN  A PERSONAL BRIEF REVIEW BY TODD SWIFT I could lie and claim Larkin, Yeats , or Dylan Thomas most excited me as a young poet, or even Pound or FT Prince - but the truth be told, it was Thom Gunn I first and most loved when I was young. Precisely, I fell in love with his first two collections, written under a formalist, Elizabethan ( Fulke Greville mainly), Yvor Winters triad of influences - uniquely fused with an interest in homerotica, pop culture ( Brando, Elvis , motorcycles). His best poem 'On The Move' is oddly presented here without the quote that began it usually - Man, you gotta go - which I loved. Gunn was - and remains - so thrilling, to me at least, because so odd. His elegance, poise, and intelligence is all about display, about surface - but the surface of a panther, who ripples with strength beneath the skin. With Gunn, you dressed to have sex. Or so I thought.  Because I was queer (I maintain the right to lay claim to that

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se.  What do I mean by smart?

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and  Silence of the Lambs .  I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".