Skip to main content

Guest Review: Stainton On Edwards

Ben Stainton reviews
by Rhian Edwards


At a time when contemporary poetry seems to be leaning towards the anti-lyrical, the anti-personal, the irony-heavy and the ā€˜shruggingā€™ (to use Jack Underwoodā€™s description), Rhian Edwardsā€™ debut collection ā€“ autobiographical, image-laden, crafted and musical ā€“ takes its cues from more traditional sources. This is a poetry of the expected, inasmuch as it does what poems are ā€˜supposed to doā€™ ā€“ speak about the writerā€™s firsthand (quirky, affecting, disturbing) experiences in a relatively uncomplicated, feelingly anecdotal way. No bad thing for those who require or admire such qualities in poetry; and this approach is sometimes telling. The absolute clarity of ā€˜Parentsā€™ Eveningā€™, for example, offers up some attractive lines and even the weaker-seeming units function in the abbreviated manner of a school report ā€“

            She has failed to grasp the planetsā€¦

            has proven violent in gamesā€¦

            has learned to darn starfish

As an opening indicator of the autobiography to come, this works well ā€“ there is humour, familiarity allowing a subtle collusion with the reader, and a blackly comic denouement ā€“ (she) ā€˜insists upon your death / as the conclusion to all her stories.ā€™

The trouble with this kind of biographical re-rendering though, is that the poet has to make us care, as readers, about the time a bird hatched in their airing cupboard (ā€˜The Hatchingā€™), or ā€˜the school holiday we played knock-a-door-runā€¦ā€™ (ā€˜Camposuilā€™). Luckily, Edwardsā€™ arsenal of charming anecdotes is substantial ā€“ the childhood / adolescent pieces are likeable, down-to-earth, and stocked with immediately striking imagery, and as we progress from adolescence through deep-seated angst (ā€˜Unmentionableā€™) and the melancholy of rediscovering a childhood toy ā€“

            you areā€¦ moribund,
            a Rosebud, a relic
            put out to pasture, living
            proof we were once something else

            (ā€˜Steedā€™)

Edwards cleverly encourages empathy and identification by dealing with familiar subjects ā€“ teenage jealousies, one-night-stands, dissatisfaction at work (the excellent, ambiguous ā€˜Alisonā€™) ā€“ allowing herself some linguistic breathing space in the process. Metaphors bob up and down; obliquity creeps in.

In its second half, the bookā€™s speaker is embroiled in domestic, sometimes bleak situations; extra-marital affairs, drunkenness, and the language understandably takes a darker, less ebullient turn. The feeling remains of reality reflecting back at us, as if these are experiences the poet needed to slough off or unburden herself from ā€“ not quite confessional in the fevered sense of Plath or Sexton, they nonetheless occasionally take on the manner of well-crafted therapy sessions; enjoying improbable metaphors ā€“ ā€˜the house turned against youā€¦ / pushed you down the stairs, / stabbed you in the handā€™ (ā€˜The Good Handā€™), cute reversals ā€“ ā€˜pick-pocketing five more minutes / from a clock that rolls its eyeā€™ (ā€˜Quotidianā€™) and witty half-rhymes ā€“

            Looking me dizzy
            licking me drunk
            in the face of our nudity
            I am not nearly naked enough

            (ā€˜Eyefulā€™)

Edwardsā€™ register shifts impressively when she casts her eye around her hometown for characters. ā€˜Going Back for Lightā€™, an anomaly within the collection, is an earthy, entirely convincing portrait of ā€˜Dannyā€™ who ā€˜got blacklisted at the colliery for making ructionsā€™. Semi-prose, half-affectionate and almost satirical, it contains something rich of the world the poet once inhabited. Similarly, in the concluding ā€˜Girl Meats Boyā€™ (winner of the John Tripp Award, 2011), the voice abruptly becomes huge and essential; the language overflowing with an inventiveness reminiscent of Dylan Thomas but also entirely her own; as if a tap has been trickling in secret and is now manically flooding the bathroom. We are reminded, through such energy, pace and playfulness, that this is a poet actually in love with poetry, rather than half-mocking it from the margins. At a time when sincerity and ā€˜the personalā€™ are generally viewed as badges of uncool, Clueless Dogs is like two fingers in the face of fashion; proud of its constructions, unselfconscious in the act of remembering.

Ben Staintonā€™s poems are forthcoming in Coin Opera 2, SSYK (5) and the Bloodaxe anthology Dear World and Everyone in it.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se....

Poetry vs. Literature

Poetry is, of course, a part of literature. But, increasingly, over the 20th century, it has become marginalised - and, famously, has less of an audience than "before". I think that, when one considers the sort of criticism levelled against Seamus Heaney and "mainstream poetry", by poet-critics like Jeffrey Side , one ought to see the wider context for poetry in the "Anglo-Saxon" world. This phrase was used by one of the UK's leading literary cultural figures, in a private conversation recently, when they spoke eloquently about the supremacy of "Anglo-Saxon novels" and their impressive command of narrative. My heart sank as I listened, for what became clear to me, in a flash, is that nothing has changed since Victorian England (for some in the literary establishment). Britain (now allied to America) and the English language with its marvellous fiction machine, still rule the waves. I personally find this an uncomfortable position - but when ...

THIS YEAR'S BAFTAS

Last year, Eva Green won the Rising Star award at the Orange BAFTAs - and this year the ceremonies promise to be even more glamorous.  The striking film writers in America silenced the Golden Globes, and look set to do the same for the Oscars, which means London may get a world-class awards night. Eyewear , like all UK citizens, has yet to see some of the films nominated (members get sent copies to watch at home in some instances before general release), but can make some predictions - want to bet? Atonement will likely win Best Film. The Bourne Ultimatum should win Best British Film, though Control may do. The Bourne trilogy was astonishingly good genre work, and has rejuvenated The Bond series in the process, so deserves the kudos. Film Not In The English Language should go to The Lives of Others . Lead Actor will be Daniel Day-Lewis . Lead Actress will be the brilliant Julie Christie , whose work in the superb Canadian film Away From Her was so brave, and moving. Ja...