Poetry criticism - that is, writing concerned with poetry, poems, poets and poetics (theory) - seems to have been sent back to the Age of Arnold at the start of the new biography of Philip Larkin , by James Booth , his long-time colleague, and apologist. Larkin is, I feel, one of the major British poets - and in this I am not alone. He has influenced, for better and worse, my poetry: his inimitable but seductive diction, syntax and themes tempted my originality. So I am not attacking Larkin here. But seriously, some of what is written in these first few pages (all I have read, so far) is balderdash. Booth states that Larkin is the most popular and greatest English poet of the last century - which may be the case, but this is not easily established by merely saying it. Kipling, Auden and Ted Hughes, let alone Stevie Smith, Betjeman, Hardy and Housman , are all serious contenders, in terms of sales, popular appeal, influence, and critical study. Booth claim...
POETRY, POLITICS, PROVOCATION AND POPULAR CULTURE SINCE 2005 - 20 YEARS AND over 10 million visits - British Library-archived