tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13726943.post2435919441346312884..comments2024-01-19T21:33:09.716+00:00Comments on E Y E W E A R, THE BLOG - FREEDOM MEANS BEING UNAFRAID TO WRITE WHAT YOU THINK: Bingham and KendallEYEWEARhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01900801847916951522noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13726943.post-85115984633570105092008-11-24T09:31:00.000+00:002008-11-24T09:31:00.000+00:00Hi Roddy, yes, I have more evidence - he edited a ...Hi Roddy, yes, I have more evidence - he edited a major book for Oxford, in the last few years, and asked David Wheatley, of all people, to write a section on the poets against the war anthologies. Wheatley, of course, makes the same noises as Kendall.EYEWEARhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01900801847916951522noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13726943.post-89312816015718022832008-11-21T01:05:00.000+00:002008-11-21T01:05:00.000+00:00You do a nice line in polemic Todd! But re "He's s...You do a nice line in polemic Todd! But re "He's spent the last few years writing or editing books which paint me as a war-profiteer, charlatan, coward and hypocrite"<BR/><BR/>Has he? Any evidence other than the chapter of the book already mentioned?<BR/><BR/>Me defending Tim K! Can't think who should be more horrified - me or him!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13726943.post-53339506318299879062008-11-20T09:16:00.000+00:002008-11-20T09:16:00.000+00:00Roddy, thnaks for this. Said anything new? - well...Roddy, thnaks for this. Said anything new? - well, until Kendall retracts his comments, or modifies them, then I think we are safe to assume he still stands by them. Academic publications are not opinion, or editorials, or blogs - they are meant to be, I think, well-thought-through positions meant to stand the test of time. Kendall's 2006 comments on the poems against the Iraq war are, therefore, relevant two years later. Now, you suggest this is a personal disagreement - which is curious. In England, it seems, anytime anyone disagrees with someone's politics, it is assumed to be personal. Well, Kendall started it - but it has never been personal at all. I have never met the man, or even had email contact with him. Never spoken to him. Further, his disagreement is not just with me, as editor of what he deems a "fashionable" and profittering anthology, but with all the poets in the book - more, he critically considers that poetry opposing the Iraq war was chiefly opportunistic and badly-written, mainly because a) it was polemical and b) written by non-combatants. I cannot imagine a more naive position than that good poems can only be written by participants of the events they describe (this would rule out almost all imaginative verse). More plainly, Kendall's sustained chapter-length assault on those writers who were offended by an illegal war is, de facto, an ideologically conservative position. However, should Kendall wish to clarify or retract his views, I'd be very glad to remove this post. He's spent the last few years writing or editing books which paint me as a war-profiteer, charlatan, coward and hypocrite (for not fighting myself in the war) so I feel it isn't so unfair of me, Roddy, to comment on his writing and views, such as I see them.EYEWEARhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01900801847916951522noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13726943.post-85772916250277566702008-11-20T01:34:00.000+00:002008-11-20T01:34:00.000+00:00I think you are being unfair here Todd - and I wri...I think you are being unfair here Todd - and I write as someone who has had many disagreements with Kendall. For a start, has he actually said anything new following his comments on your anthology a few years ago?<BR/><BR/>I also think it's unfair to claim that Tim is repelled by political engagement from poets - after all, he has written a well-received book on the subject in which your anthology is in the minority of situations of political engagement and protest which he seems to dislike.<BR/><BR/>And, what's more, it's wrong to make judgements on someone's political colouring on the basis of a personal disagreement. Tim may be a 'literary conservative' but I've no reason to think he is a political one or a supporter of the Iraq war. Unless you know better?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13726943.post-6652528813354010722008-11-20T01:00:00.000+00:002008-11-20T01:00:00.000+00:00"While America has elected an anti-Iraq war presid..."While America has elected an anti-Iraq war president, Britain, with its limited democracy, resists any public inquiry into the mess..."<BR/><BR/>Of course the election of Obama extends beyond the symbolic, but are you suggesting that the US has anything more than limited democracy?Stuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17856424693319815534noreply@blogger.com