Skip to main content

GUEST REVIEW: Houghton On Sarnat



Homeless Chronicles from Abraham to Burning Man
reviewed by Nick Houghton
by Gerard Sarnat

Gerard Sarnat, now in his seventh decade, has brought the precision learnt during his medical career, combined it with the compassion acquired while running staffed clinics for those on the margins of society, to produce a collection of great power. By fusing his own life experiences with those of the outsiders described in the poems, Sarnat has achieved the goal of every poet, that of making the personal universal.

In the opening section Sons Rise in the West, the two poems First Times and Whimperbang: Yad Vasheem Revisited, initially seem aesthetically worlds apart. However, the two poems are linked by the juxtaposition of the joyfully erotic in First Times, when the poet’s first sexual encounter is described,


basement rendezvous dark and dank, huddled near the furnace, boil boil, trouble trouble trouble,

and the bleak evocation of industrialised slaughter in, Whimperbang:Yad Vasheem Revisited.


In the shadow of cold chimneys, g-d makes us pay for the air.
Heine was right:
when books burn, humans are destined to be next.


This weaving together of personal rite of passage with an event – The Holocaust – that defies understanding, is the fuel that powers this collection and, by delivering this particular example so early in the book, the reader is quickly acclimatised to the rarefied but entirely accessible nature of the poems.

Sarnat’s work with addicts, the homeless and the disenfranchised – work which has formed a significant part of his career – also powerfully informs the collection. His eye is honest and empathic when he describes a group of homeless hostel dwellers in The Four Corners, 2003.

untended unpresent absentee mindbodies angular to the universe,
mostly shrouded in grays and blacks, droop in morose lagoons,
swoon under monsoon thickets, doze daymares on the stoop.

Sarnat’s honesty extends to encompass the conflicting motivations that drive people who work in this area when, in the same poem, he writes,


I giggle at us practitioners of impermanence, mostly atheists
who worship Monet cathedrals much as Vipassana nowhere.
yes, bricks and mortar appear quite enduring
-           a sultra of non-abdication, our edifice complex?

This is the kind of self-deprecating humour that is essential if one is to work successfully with the most marginalised in society. That this is not gallows humour though, is evidenced by the single line,


 I am glad to be a physician not the coroner.


This weights the humour, giving it a poignancy that illustrates the author’s commitment to his work, both with people and words.

In Irregular People: M-W-F, Sarnat perfectly catches the trenchant yet inclusive tone of a community clinic with,


You’re on the nod tomato can,
-           it’s time to move on, and make it quick.

It is a testament to his humanity that he has retained a poetic ear capable of such subtlety while delivering real care; these are messages from a hardworking soldier in the fight against social exclusion, not mere reconnaissance. This is driven home in the next stanza, when he paints a scene of quotidian horror, in language as precise as any cut made with his scalpel.


Injecting her weekly STD cocktail
through vermillion slattern capris, I remind flaming Maria Diana
this ain’t the place to transact charnel house commerce.


These characters are evoked with great clarity and sympathy. I cannot recall a more humane engagement with people on the margins of society than the one contained in My Odyssey, My Iliad, when he describes a young, homeless Spanish man on the street.


Tied to the mast, sailor set to sea
without biscuit, on the street, no way home, no family or papers,
too weak to work, alone till the shelter re-opens tonight,
strongly greaved, unharbored, he weeps, ‘Gracias,


By exploring the universal through the prism of the personal, Sarnat has transformed these urban wraiths into a metaphor for the post WW2 refugees of the poet’s youth in newly multi-cultural America.

Later in the collection, his sense of isolation returns in Lost in Translation when after an afternoon of,


multicultural allusion, intertextual repurposing,
dehyphenated esoterica – my stomach growls,

he sees,


passing lovers holding hands, whispering Mandarin,
ill at ease, I pause my cell before smoked tea duck.

As the collection progresses, this more personal tone becomes predominant, and we glimpse the beauty and occasional frustrations of family life as, in My Own Little Israels.


Though most of the time time is not mine,
Once a blue moon I shed skin
Of father, husband, breadwinner.

Everything stops for an afternoon.
I go inside for a date with myself.
A matinee where Gerard stars.’ 


Homeless Chronicles from Abraham to Burning Man describes the trauma that attaches to modernity, be it cultural dis-placement, homelessness, addiction or the overarching horror of genocide, while still managing to retain a humane and optimistic voice. It is uplifting to read a voice so steeped in recent history and yet so unbowed by experience, and I am glad that Gerard Sarnat’s powerful, incisive but above all poetic gifts have been brought to my attention.  

Nick Houghton.  


Nick Houghton has recently completed a creative writing and English literature degree at Kingston University. His first novel, Dirty Tuesday will be completed in September 2013.          
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AMERICA PSYCHO

According to the latest CBS, ABC, etc, polls, Clinton is still likely to beat Trump - by percentile odds of 66% to 33% and change. But the current popular vote is much closer, probably tied with the error of margin, around 44% each. Trump has to win more key battleground states to win, and may not - but he is ahead in Florida...

We will all know, in a week, whether we live in a world gone madder, or just relatively mad.

While it seems likely calmer heads will prevail, the recent Brexit win shows that polls can mislead, especially when one of the options is considered a bit embarrassing, rude or even racist - and Trump qualifies for these, at least.

If 42-45% of Americans admit they would vote for Trump, what does that say about the ones not so vocal? For surely, they must be there, as well. Some of the undecided will slide, and more likely they will slide to the wilder and more exciting fringe candidate. As may the libertarians.

Eyewear predicts that Trump will just about manage to win th…

DANGER, MAN

Like a crazed killer clown, whether we are thrilled, horrified, shocked, or angered (or all of these) by Donald Trump, we cannot claim to be rid of him just yet. He bestrides the world stage like a silverback gorilla (according to one British thug), or a bad analogy, but he is there, a figure, no longer of fun, but grave concern.

There has long been a history of misogynistic behaviour in American gangster culture - one thinks of the grapefruit in the face in The Public Enemy, or Sinatra throwing a woman out of his hotel room and later commenting he didn't realise there was a pool below to break her fall, or the polluted womb in Pacino'sScarface... and of course, some gangsta rap is also sexist.  American culture has a difficult way with handling the combined aspects of male power, and male privilege, that, especially in heteronormative capitalist enclaves, where money/pussy both become grabbable, reified objects and objectives (The Wolf of Wall Street for instance), an ugly fus…

OSCAR SMOSHCAR

The Oscars - Academy Awards officially - were once huge cultural events - in 1975, Frank Sinatra, Sammy Davis Jr, Shirley MacLaineandBob Hope co-hosted, for example - and Best Picture noms included The Conversation and Chinatown. Godfather Part 2 won. Last two years, movies titled Birdman and Spotlight won, and the hosts and those films are retrospectively minor, trifling. This year, some important, resonant films are up for consideration - including Hidden Figures and Moonlight, two favourites of this blog. Viola Davis and Denzel Washington will hopefully win for their sterling performances in Fences. However, La La Land - the most superficial and empty Best Picture contender since Gigi in 1959 (which beat Vertigo) - could smite all comers, and render this year's awards historically trivial, even idiotic.

The Oscars often opt for safe, optimistic films, or safe, pessimistic films, that are usually about white men (less often, white women) finding their path to doing the right thin…