Skip to main content

Eyewear On Zero Dark Thirty



Eyewear's Film Critic James A. George On The Latest CIA Thriller From America...

Kathryn Bigelow’s Zero Dark Thirty is American award fodder that’s bold enough to raise some serious issues (namely, the use of torture) and has thus been bashed for it in the news. As with every year around the film award seasons, a conspiracy of controversy comes into existence in order to deter awards going to certain films and such – the theory that this film glorifies torture is completely unfounded. While the film may win many an award, the only award it deserves is for best actress, perhaps.
Maya likes eyewear


Zero Dark Thirty tells the grand story of the decade long search for Osama Bin Laden while retaining a human element. The only other American film to balance real-life large scale politics and this human element is the classic All The President’s Men – which dealt with the uncovering of the Watergate scandal while successfully developing its characters throughout the struggle, something Zero Dark Thirty fails to do. The performances themselves somewhat make up for this, especially the central performance from Jessica Chastain as Maya. I don’t think Chastain could act poorly if she tried; she’s a true chameleon of the highest caliber.

So if the characters are somewhat thin, do the politics take the forefront? Not especially. While the general nature of America’s rigid hierarchical politics is represented well –with some witty flourishes such as Maya’s relegation concerning the seating plan of the war room – we are not bogged down in the details. This is something I appreciate, others value a film with politics up to its knees – in which case Speilberg’s Lincoln is worth a watch. The film really comes into its own in moments of tension and action, where the editing, camerawork, acting and direction all align. It’s not spoiler to say the last section of the film deals with the raid on Bin Laden, and this sequence alone is masterful.


There are some real inconsistencies in this film but it does genuinely warrant its running time, and is one of the few films coming out of Hollywood not in need of a serious half hour trim. The screenplay is really quite great and definitely shines through, where perhaps it should not. Consider set and costume design: in this film they are so accurate and real they become invisible, the highest compliment. So when contemplating this film retrospectively, the fact that the screenplay is so prominent means that something, somewhere has possibly gone wrong.


While it is hard to pin down why, my guess is that the film seems unsure whether it wants to be a tense drama or a faux-documentary. The cinematography and directing seems to conflict between these two aesthetics, and the occasional jarring real-footage mixed in at moments of narrative interlude does not help. Reviews are tricky. As I watched the film, I was gripped and indulged. I left the screening somewhat pumped from all of it, but it soon faded, and with some time and distance, I now know why. Whether you go out of your way to see this film at the cinema or not really depends on your interest in the topic. If the hype around Bigelow’s previous film, The Hurt Locker, confounded you as it did me, I would suggest waiting for the opportunity to watch it on DVD.
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DANGER, MAN

Like a crazed killer clown, whether we are thrilled, horrified, shocked, or angered (or all of these) by Donald Trump, we cannot claim to be rid of him just yet. He bestrides the world stage like a silverback gorilla (according to one British thug), or a bad analogy, but he is there, a figure, no longer of fun, but grave concern.

There has long been a history of misogynistic behaviour in American gangster culture - one thinks of the grapefruit in the face in The Public Enemy, or Sinatra throwing a woman out of his hotel room and later commenting he didn't realise there was a pool below to break her fall, or the polluted womb in Pacino'sScarface... and of course, some gangsta rap is also sexist.  American culture has a difficult way with handling the combined aspects of male power, and male privilege, that, especially in heteronormative capitalist enclaves, where money/pussy both become grabbable, reified objects and objectives (The Wolf of Wall Street for instance), an ugly fus…

AMERICA PSYCHO

According to the latest CBS, ABC, etc, polls, Clinton is still likely to beat Trump - by percentile odds of 66% to 33% and change. But the current popular vote is much closer, probably tied with the error of margin, around 44% each. Trump has to win more key battleground states to win, and may not - but he is ahead in Florida...

We will all know, in a week, whether we live in a world gone madder, or just relatively mad.

While it seems likely calmer heads will prevail, the recent Brexit win shows that polls can mislead, especially when one of the options is considered a bit embarrassing, rude or even racist - and Trump qualifies for these, at least.

If 42-45% of Americans admit they would vote for Trump, what does that say about the ones not so vocal? For surely, they must be there, as well. Some of the undecided will slide, and more likely they will slide to the wilder and more exciting fringe candidate. As may the libertarians.

Eyewear predicts that Trump will just about manage to win th…

SEXTON SHORTLIST!

Announcing the Shortlist for the 2016 Sexton PrizeSeptember 13, 2016 / By Kelly Davio
Eyewear Publishing is pleased to announce the shortlist for the 2016 Sexton Prize. The finalists are, in no particular order, as follows:


THE BARBAROUS CENTURY, Leah Umansky
HISTORY OF GONE, Lynn Schmeidler
SEVERE CLEAR, Maya Catherine Popa
GIMME THAT. DON’T SMITE ME, Steve Kronen
SCHEHERAZADE AND OTHER REDEPLOYMENTS, David McAleavey
AN AMERICAN PURGATORY, Rebecca Gayle Howell
SIT IN THE DARK WITH ME, Jesse Lee Kercheval

The shortlist was selected by Eyewear’s Director Todd Swift with Senior Editor Kelly Davio. Don Share of Poetry Magazine will select the winning manuscript, which will be released at the 2017 AWP conference in Washington, D.C. The winner will be announced in October. 
Congratulations to our finalists!