Skip to main content

Guest Review: Saunders On Noakes



Cape Town

EYEWEAR BLOG IS RUN BY EYEWEAR PUBLISHING, WHICH PUBLISHES THIS BOOK

The poetry in Kate Noakes’ previous books, Ocean to Interior (Mighty Erudite 2007) and The Wall-Menders (Two Rivers Press 2009), has been described as ‘sensuous and vivid’, ‘rich in detail’, ‘elemental’, ‘imaginative’, and (by Gillian Clarke) as ‘loving the world’.  The sensitive observation and formal skill that elicited these comments are there again, with added vigour, verve and economy of expression, in her new collection Cape Town. 

Having for a short while worked (and written poetry) abroad myself, I marvel at how well Noakes catches in one hand the vivid impressions of being a stranger in a strange land, whilst with the other she keeps a firm grip on technical matters of form, lexicon, sound effects, emotional tone.  She opens with a prologue poem, ‘Hirundine’, which invites us to read the rest of the book as emerging from – and always returning to – a delicately-expressed yet unapologetic awareness of her identity as a temporary resident, a migrant who has flown south.  This disarming first move makes it possible for the poems to sustain their surprise at the onward rush of new experiences, all senses on alert. 

Noakes’ sense organs are always unjaded connoisseurs of colour, aroma, pattern, atmosphere, of connection and dissonance of one kind or another.  In this book they are also able to detect the kinds of social and political realities implicated in ‘the fateful convergence of… peoples’ that is South Africa.  Noakes’ use of an extract from Mandela’s inaugural speech, in which this phrase occurs, as an epigraph for the book lets us know at once that we need to understand this work as engagĂ© – though, as we realise almost as quickly, as much with the demands of poetry as with the challenges of politics. 

One of the astonishing features of the book is the high energy which rarely flags in the quality of attention any more than the range of subjects.  Many of the poems inhabit the natural world with a witty or bemused intimacy;  and many others commemorate momentary but memorable encounters with people.  There is so much to see, wonder at, be disturbed by, from Cape wildlife – ‘The Snoek’, ‘Baboon’, ‘Guinea Fowl (helmeted)’, ‘Hadedas’, ‘White ibis and egrets’, ‘A stone curlew for you’ and two poems about the near-extinct Quagga – to the origins of apartheid (‘The Hedge’) and a sideways look at dictatorship (‘The dictator’s eyes’ and ‘The dictator’s last days’). 

Sometimes the poems do reportage (‘Flower-sellers, De Waal Park’, ‘Central reservation equinox’), successfully and satisfyingly – not a word wasted, the images clearer, for excluding extraneous details, than real life, the adjectives doing their basic duty of differentiation.  So, for example, ‘southern’, ‘leafless’ and ‘proud’ (of tropical flowers) are the three adjectives in the first three-line stanza of ‘Central reservation equinox’;  there are none in the second stanza, and just a pair – ‘red acrylic’ – in the last. 

More often, though, the reporter is part of the subject under scrutiny, as in Razor Wire, which is quoted in full here:

I walk the razed section of the city / looking at brown grass, bricks, concrete. // Plastic bags tatter against the chain link. / The late afternoon sun cuts the air slant. // A man thrusts his hand through a gap, / braves its metal thorns to shake mine. // It’s soft, unexpected from the grazes / on his arms, his face, the missing // chunk of his nose. / Here, here, my sister, welcome.

This understated self-reflection – which we may miss because it’s the opposite of self-absorption – functions as a leit-motif that guides how our own attention is directed towards the people and things that deserve to be noticed, with enjoyment (‘Espresso, or the best cup of coffee in the world’), suppressed horror (‘Burying the Hydra’s tooth’ – about finding a puff-adder in her waste-basket) or bloody-mindedness (‘Green and yellow blanket man, Long Street’ – about being hacked off by a beggar’s daily importuning on her way to work).

The way the poetry works is also without self-conscious flourish – the command of sentence length, line-break, enjambment, definite and indefinite article, the spare deployment of adjectives and adverbs, the compacting of metaphor and simile in exact phrases, all the small-scale but telling craft-work of poetry, is consistently meticulous and impressive.  It also manages to be supportive of the overall project, to tell the story of a visit, framed by two beautiful poems in couplets, ‘Waking up in fairyland’ and ‘Going to bed in fairyland’.  The only poem I thought had a density, perhaps even a self-consciousness, of expression that made me think more about the poetry’s construction than about its purpose was the very last poem in the book, the coming-home epilogue ‘Shabby land-song’.  Well, there’s probably a poetic truth in there too – home is ‘another place’ where the poet already ‘knows the name[s]’ of things, is more knowing as a poet than she was in South Africa.

The word that was used of the (entirely secular) work I did abroad was ‘mission’, and this now seems to me to be an appropriate word for Noakes’ book, its mission being to bring home to us how various the world is, how colourful, difficult, urgent, risky, impossible and delightful living in it can be for the short time we visit it;  and how it conjures from us, if we are both lucky and as skilful as she, a fresh and matching eloquence.
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AMERICA PSYCHO

According to the latest CBS, ABC, etc, polls, Clinton is still likely to beat Trump - by percentile odds of 66% to 33% and change. But the current popular vote is much closer, probably tied with the error of margin, around 44% each. Trump has to win more key battleground states to win, and may not - but he is ahead in Florida...

We will all know, in a week, whether we live in a world gone madder, or just relatively mad.

While it seems likely calmer heads will prevail, the recent Brexit win shows that polls can mislead, especially when one of the options is considered a bit embarrassing, rude or even racist - and Trump qualifies for these, at least.

If 42-45% of Americans admit they would vote for Trump, what does that say about the ones not so vocal? For surely, they must be there, as well. Some of the undecided will slide, and more likely they will slide to the wilder and more exciting fringe candidate. As may the libertarians.

Eyewear predicts that Trump will just about manage to win th…

DANGER, MAN

Like a crazed killer clown, whether we are thrilled, horrified, shocked, or angered (or all of these) by Donald Trump, we cannot claim to be rid of him just yet. He bestrides the world stage like a silverback gorilla (according to one British thug), or a bad analogy, but he is there, a figure, no longer of fun, but grave concern.

There has long been a history of misogynistic behaviour in American gangster culture - one thinks of the grapefruit in the face in The Public Enemy, or Sinatra throwing a woman out of his hotel room and later commenting he didn't realise there was a pool below to break her fall, or the polluted womb in Pacino'sScarface... and of course, some gangsta rap is also sexist.  American culture has a difficult way with handling the combined aspects of male power, and male privilege, that, especially in heteronormative capitalist enclaves, where money/pussy both become grabbable, reified objects and objectives (The Wolf of Wall Street for instance), an ugly fus…

OSCAR SMOSHCAR

The Oscars - Academy Awards officially - were once huge cultural events - in 1975, Frank Sinatra, Sammy Davis Jr, Shirley MacLaineandBob Hope co-hosted, for example - and Best Picture noms included The Conversation and Chinatown. Godfather Part 2 won. Last two years, movies titled Birdman and Spotlight won, and the hosts and those films are retrospectively minor, trifling. This year, some important, resonant films are up for consideration - including Hidden Figures and Moonlight, two favourites of this blog. Viola Davis and Denzel Washington will hopefully win for their sterling performances in Fences. However, La La Land - the most superficial and empty Best Picture contender since Gigi in 1959 (which beat Vertigo) - could smite all comers, and render this year's awards historically trivial, even idiotic.

The Oscars often opt for safe, optimistic films, or safe, pessimistic films, that are usually about white men (less often, white women) finding their path to doing the right thin…