Skip to main content

Battersea Press Release: A New Source of Poetic Energy

Press release: The Battersea Review: for immediate release

The staff:

Publisher and Managing Editor: Umit Singh Dhuga
Contributing Editors: Ben Mazer, Philip Nikolayev, Todd Swift (UK), Jeet Thayil (India)
Art Director: Drew Vanderveen

Editorial Offices: USA

Editorial and Business Contact: email Umit Singh Dhuga at

The magazine will appear quarterly, in both online and print formats. The first issue will debut on the Battersea Review website, ; on June 1. The print version of Vol. 1, No. 1 will appear in September.

Submissions are rolling, i.e. read continuously, as we are a quarterly.
Exceptional criticism or prose is especially desired.

There are two versions of the cover floating around facebook. The one that includes Todd Swift's name (the one that appears most recently on my own wall) is the most recent one, but three names are yet to be added to the cover: Greg Delanty, Anna Razumnaya, David Meltzer.

Contributors include: Ben Mazer (the entirety of 'The King'), Philip Nikolayev ('Juvenilia'), Stephen Sturgeon, Gerard Malanga, Todd Swift, Katia Kapovich, Jeet Thayil, John Hennessy, Stephen Burt, Joe Green, Robert Archambeau, Greg Delanty, David Meltzer, Ailbhe Darcy, Kathleen Rooney, Ernest Hilbert, Matthew Silverman, Mark Schorr, Unpublished Weldon Kees, edited and introduced by James Reidel, Nora Delaney on Archie Burnett's Philip Larkin, Mario Murgia on translating Ariosto, and Anna Razumnaya on the interrogation of Mandelstam and 'The Stalin Epigram'.

Editorial Policy:
The Battersea Review seeks especially gifted poets and people who can write first rate critical essays. We may at times be looking for critical essays on particular topics or written in a diversity of modes. 1940s poetry or poets could be a topic of particular interest. Any really brilliant essay analysing first rate poetry to a greater degree of precision and complexity and definition than one would ordinarily find in a contemporary literary essay would be highly suitable to our pages. We are hoping for a revival of first rate criticism, and that Empson for example would be familiar reading to the serious critic. We want aesthetic criticism, and we want philosophical criticism. Historical criticism is also of interest. We also want material from the past, biographical essays that are original and cover uncharted territory, works in various forms such as letters or interviews or transcriptions, first rate verse drama, essays about first rate contemporary poets, and of course exceptional poetry. Brilliant hairbrained schemes are always acceptable. Oh, and topics of especial interest are (in no particular order) Keith Douglas, Henry Reed, poets of the 1940s, Donald Davie, Empson, Richards, A. S. Eddington, the Order of the Golden Dawn, Yeats, Beckett, T. S. Eliot, Hart Crane, Robert Lowell, Robert Graves, Dylan Thomas, aesthetics, classical poetry, Indian poetry, Scottish and Welsh poetry, British cinema of the 1940s, the BBC radio, The Criterion, Encounter, poetry of earlier periods, essays about distribution and communication in the modern period, essays about distribution and communication in the cold war period, royalty, the Anglican church, Rome, and espionage. This is not a complete list, but only meant to be suggestive. We are not looking for prose that is blatantly academic, except where it suits some dignified purpose.

Popular posts from this blog


According to the latest CBS, ABC, etc, polls, Clinton is still likely to beat Trump - by percentile odds of 66% to 33% and change. But the current popular vote is much closer, probably tied with the error of margin, around 44% each. Trump has to win more key battleground states to win, and may not - but he is ahead in Florida...

We will all know, in a week, whether we live in a world gone madder, or just relatively mad.

While it seems likely calmer heads will prevail, the recent Brexit win shows that polls can mislead, especially when one of the options is considered a bit embarrassing, rude or even racist - and Trump qualifies for these, at least.

If 42-45% of Americans admit they would vote for Trump, what does that say about the ones not so vocal? For surely, they must be there, as well. Some of the undecided will slide, and more likely they will slide to the wilder and more exciting fringe candidate. As may the libertarians.

Eyewear predicts that Trump will just about manage to win th…


Like a crazed killer clown, whether we are thrilled, horrified, shocked, or angered (or all of these) by Donald Trump, we cannot claim to be rid of him just yet. He bestrides the world stage like a silverback gorilla (according to one British thug), or a bad analogy, but he is there, a figure, no longer of fun, but grave concern.

There has long been a history of misogynistic behaviour in American gangster culture - one thinks of the grapefruit in the face in The Public Enemy, or Sinatra throwing a woman out of his hotel room and later commenting he didn't realise there was a pool below to break her fall, or the polluted womb in Pacino'sScarface... and of course, some gangsta rap is also sexist.  American culture has a difficult way with handling the combined aspects of male power, and male privilege, that, especially in heteronormative capitalist enclaves, where money/pussy both become grabbable, reified objects and objectives (The Wolf of Wall Street for instance), an ugly fus…


The Oscars - Academy Awards officially - were once huge cultural events - in 1975, Frank Sinatra, Sammy Davis Jr, Shirley MacLaineandBob Hope co-hosted, for example - and Best Picture noms included The Conversation and Chinatown. Godfather Part 2 won. Last two years, movies titled Birdman and Spotlight won, and the hosts and those films are retrospectively minor, trifling. This year, some important, resonant films are up for consideration - including Hidden Figures and Moonlight, two favourites of this blog. Viola Davis and Denzel Washington will hopefully win for their sterling performances in Fences. However, La La Land - the most superficial and empty Best Picture contender since Gigi in 1959 (which beat Vertigo) - could smite all comers, and render this year's awards historically trivial, even idiotic.

The Oscars often opt for safe, optimistic films, or safe, pessimistic films, that are usually about white men (less often, white women) finding their path to doing the right thin…