Skip to main content

Guest Review: Dekker On Williams

Nikki Dekker reviews
by Nerys Williams

Nerys Williams’ Contemporary Poetry is a difficult book to finish. To be fair, textbooks are hardly suited to be ploughed through cover-to-cover, but Contemporary Poetry is an especially demanding read. Every page contains at least two references to a poet (not simple theoretical footnotes, but enthusiastic endorsements of their work). With these frequent mentions and tangents, the reader is likely to leave for the library every other page, effectively being stuck with this book for months.

And what a way to be stuck. In six chapters, Williams sketches the scenery of contemporary poetry in great detail. At the end of the book, one will be fit to distinguish between the different directions and underlying poetics of contemporary work – which is, after all, the reason I personally wanted to read it. As a young poet writing in her second language, I am insufficiently schooled in the Anglophonic tradition as well as unaware of the current poetic climate. Contemporary Poetry takes care of both problems. Williams details the current situation from a theoretical background firmly rooted in the English and American canon.

The aim of the book, as detailed in its introduction, is to go beyond a simple collection of contemporary work - that’s what anthologies are for. Williams wishes to familiarize students with debates, ideas and movements surrounding contemporary poetry. The first half of the book deals mostly with its foundation: discussing the lyrical subject, politics and performance, it focuses mostly on 20th century movements. The second half of the book details our contemporary literary environment, for instance eco-criticism and multilingualism.

Williams has a keen interest in poetics, which she gathers from manifestoes and informal interviews, and relates to larger models of thought. It seems self-evident that lyrical subjectivism can’t be discussed without a mention of Barthes, but to include Lefebvre in the poetics of nature, or Lacan within the reflection on language, is surely to go beyond the bare minimum of theoretical support. The insightful research underlying Contemporary Poetry really makes the book worthwhile – especially since these philosophical backgrounds are both short and relatively easy to understand.

Contemporary Poetry is a textbook. While each chapter details a network of relating subjects and theories, it is concluded in a handful of scholastic ‘key points’ such as

“Poetic travelogues offer a further perspective on identity, community and environment”[1] and
“Poetry has a political role in excavating past histories and granting articulation to silenced voices.”[2]

These general summaries hardly relate to the detailed and nuanced arguments they are said to conclude. Instead, it would have been more helpful to reiterate the bigger picture: how do the different roles and perspectives relate to each other? The book often goes off on a tangent, and the student may need some guidance putting the pieces together.

On the other hand, the lack of generalizing statements and birds-eye conclusions is the great strength of this book. Williams always starts from the contemporary work itself and sticks to logical observations. This is not to say that the content of this book is predictable – to the contrary, it is very original, widening the perspective on poetry. When discussing the notion of performance, Williams quickly moves beyond slam poetry to discuss the visual performance on the page and the way a poem can ‘perform’ (see Judith Butler) with irony and mimicry. The focus in all these instances is not on the poet, as performance is commonly understood, but on lingual performance. 

While it could be read as a formalist, language-oriented study, Contemporary Poetry does not shy away from politics and their relation to literature. The book appreciates the poetic variety globalism has introduced in poetry, while never losing sight of its colonial history. Williams does not romanticize the historical events and details the embedded power inequities in international poetries. I personally found her chapter on Multilingual Poetries the most compelling. It considers “bilingualism as a sort of simultaneity in the writing”[3], linking it to the politics of everyday: “the co-existence of cultural models within the same society, and the internal multiplicity of personality”[4].

In comparison, Williams’ conclusion on ‘electronic writing’ seems a bit insufficient. While it defines electronic writing as digitally ‘born’, it fails to consider the younger demographic of poets who have actually ‘grown up’ online. It might have been interesting to consider the differences between paper writing (definite, concrete, static) and electronic writing (fragile, intangible, dynamic), or the online interaction between different languages. While the book is focused on Anglophone writing, it seems unreasonable to extend that focus to the online realm, which readily provides translation and “enables a mass audience and speedy dissemination.”[5]

Contemporary Poetry is rigidly focused on the poetic work – and it ought to be praised for that. It offers a perspective on contemporary poetry as a genre, practice and theory. This book transcends the standard anthology by examining poetics and relating these to philosophical concerns, thereby enhancing the student’s understanding of both craft and art. As Lyn Heijinian’s observed: “theory asks what practice does and in asking, it sees the connections that practice makes.”[6] This is precisely how Contemporary Poetry works: it offers ideas, effectively inspiring further reading and writing.

Nikki Dekker is an MA poet at Kingston University, who holds a BA in Literary Theory from the University of Amsterdam (Netherlands). She blogs at

[1] Nerys Williams, ‘Contemporary Poetry’, page 165
[2] Nerys Williams, ‘Contemporary Poetry’, page 92
[3] Nerys Williams, ‘Contemporary Poetry’, page 188.
[4] Tzvetan Todorov, ‘Bilingualism, Dialogism and Schizophrenia’ in Williams, page 188.
[5] Nerys Williams, ‘Contemporary Poetry’, page 208.
[6] Nerys Williams, ‘ContemporaryPoetry’, page 6.

Popular posts from this blog


According to the latest CBS, ABC, etc, polls, Clinton is still likely to beat Trump - by percentile odds of 66% to 33% and change. But the current popular vote is much closer, probably tied with the error of margin, around 44% each. Trump has to win more key battleground states to win, and may not - but he is ahead in Florida...

We will all know, in a week, whether we live in a world gone madder, or just relatively mad.

While it seems likely calmer heads will prevail, the recent Brexit win shows that polls can mislead, especially when one of the options is considered a bit embarrassing, rude or even racist - and Trump qualifies for these, at least.

If 42-45% of Americans admit they would vote for Trump, what does that say about the ones not so vocal? For surely, they must be there, as well. Some of the undecided will slide, and more likely they will slide to the wilder and more exciting fringe candidate. As may the libertarians.

Eyewear predicts that Trump will just about manage to win th…


Like a crazed killer clown, whether we are thrilled, horrified, shocked, or angered (or all of these) by Donald Trump, we cannot claim to be rid of him just yet. He bestrides the world stage like a silverback gorilla (according to one British thug), or a bad analogy, but he is there, a figure, no longer of fun, but grave concern.

There has long been a history of misogynistic behaviour in American gangster culture - one thinks of the grapefruit in the face in The Public Enemy, or Sinatra throwing a woman out of his hotel room and later commenting he didn't realise there was a pool below to break her fall, or the polluted womb in Pacino'sScarface... and of course, some gangsta rap is also sexist.  American culture has a difficult way with handling the combined aspects of male power, and male privilege, that, especially in heteronormative capitalist enclaves, where money/pussy both become grabbable, reified objects and objectives (The Wolf of Wall Street for instance), an ugly fus…


The Oscars - Academy Awards officially - were once huge cultural events - in 1975, Frank Sinatra, Sammy Davis Jr, Shirley MacLaineandBob Hope co-hosted, for example - and Best Picture noms included The Conversation and Chinatown. Godfather Part 2 won. Last two years, movies titled Birdman and Spotlight won, and the hosts and those films are retrospectively minor, trifling. This year, some important, resonant films are up for consideration - including Hidden Figures and Moonlight, two favourites of this blog. Viola Davis and Denzel Washington will hopefully win for their sterling performances in Fences. However, La La Land - the most superficial and empty Best Picture contender since Gigi in 1959 (which beat Vertigo) - could smite all comers, and render this year's awards historically trivial, even idiotic.

The Oscars often opt for safe, optimistic films, or safe, pessimistic films, that are usually about white men (less often, white women) finding their path to doing the right thin…