Skip to main content

Guest Review: Loveday On Lovelock-Burke


Mike Loveday reviews
Dayship
by Helen Lovelock-Burke

The poems in Lovelock-Burke’s debut collection Dayship are the kind of poems for which people first fall in love with poetry. The landscapes are the poetry landscapes we know and cherish: apple trees, thicket hedges, farmland, the oceans and tides, dreams, the changes of days and sunlight, memories of loved ones, silence and shadow, stars and clouds, frosts and winds. And they are invested with a mixture of nostalgia, celebration, regret and hope.

What makes Lovelock-Burke’s work particularly delightful is the deceptive way in which words are put together strangely, yet so simply that you hardly notice that strangeness. The poet twists traditional syntax and vocabulary just enough to make the words start sparking against each other.  We are in familiar territory but the poet is keeping us on our toes:

“We curve the land and sky
over this one black
winter thorn and thicket hedge.

Bend into us, bury yourself
in fragile, almost not
scent of dwelling.”
(Clouds on the Blackthorn, p.21)

“Beyond the this-i-see
rest all the hours
when cowslips glowed
white in the moonlight”
(By the Window, p.73)

Wish was a non-word
like the or black.
The did not need
to be
not saying anything
it was nothing.”
(The Time Before, p.50)

The title of the book – Dayship - is a perfect example of the poet’s style. The word feels entirely right and natural, yet it doesn’t exist in the English language. Its naturalness echoes the terms of the known world, yet it somehow conjures interesting associations beyond that. It is possible to hear within it the learned qualities of a skill or trade in existing through the days – dayship becomes like musicianship, or apprenticeship. Yet it also suggests being carried by days, or describes a vessel carrying them – a ship of days. This is the kind of quiet, measured gesture that runs right through Lovelock-Burke’s poetry.

The collection is balanced poignantly between losses and gains, but the poet’s love of language, the careful and tender handling of words, is what stays with the reader. The diction of the short lines contains echoes of Emily Dickinson, and the themes of the poems – searching for connection and wholeness, a fragile, doubting spirit, the acute awareness of transience – call to mind Edward Thomas.

Helen Lovelock-Burke uses a life’s wisdom to infuse her descriptions with a kind of serene restlessness, as moods and scenes shift, and certainties slip away.

“Snow is a music
on trees and lane
but we are too old.”
(Early Morning Snow, p.59)

“even as the second open
minutes start to count
get thin and tight so they can fold
tidy, into clocks.”
(Clocks, p.34)

Mike Loveday is a poet, poetry editor, and is completing an MFA at Kingston University.
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AMERICA PSYCHO

According to the latest CBS, ABC, etc, polls, Clinton is still likely to beat Trump - by percentile odds of 66% to 33% and change. But the current popular vote is much closer, probably tied with the error of margin, around 44% each. Trump has to win more key battleground states to win, and may not - but he is ahead in Florida...

We will all know, in a week, whether we live in a world gone madder, or just relatively mad.

While it seems likely calmer heads will prevail, the recent Brexit win shows that polls can mislead, especially when one of the options is considered a bit embarrassing, rude or even racist - and Trump qualifies for these, at least.

If 42-45% of Americans admit they would vote for Trump, what does that say about the ones not so vocal? For surely, they must be there, as well. Some of the undecided will slide, and more likely they will slide to the wilder and more exciting fringe candidate. As may the libertarians.

Eyewear predicts that Trump will just about manage to win th…

DANGER, MAN

Like a crazed killer clown, whether we are thrilled, horrified, shocked, or angered (or all of these) by Donald Trump, we cannot claim to be rid of him just yet. He bestrides the world stage like a silverback gorilla (according to one British thug), or a bad analogy, but he is there, a figure, no longer of fun, but grave concern.

There has long been a history of misogynistic behaviour in American gangster culture - one thinks of the grapefruit in the face in The Public Enemy, or Sinatra throwing a woman out of his hotel room and later commenting he didn't realise there was a pool below to break her fall, or the polluted womb in Pacino'sScarface... and of course, some gangsta rap is also sexist.  American culture has a difficult way with handling the combined aspects of male power, and male privilege, that, especially in heteronormative capitalist enclaves, where money/pussy both become grabbable, reified objects and objectives (The Wolf of Wall Street for instance), an ugly fus…

OSCAR SMOSHCAR

The Oscars - Academy Awards officially - were once huge cultural events - in 1975, Frank Sinatra, Sammy Davis Jr, Shirley MacLaineandBob Hope co-hosted, for example - and Best Picture noms included The Conversation and Chinatown. Godfather Part 2 won. Last two years, movies titled Birdman and Spotlight won, and the hosts and those films are retrospectively minor, trifling. This year, some important, resonant films are up for consideration - including Hidden Figures and Moonlight, two favourites of this blog. Viola Davis and Denzel Washington will hopefully win for their sterling performances in Fences. However, La La Land - the most superficial and empty Best Picture contender since Gigi in 1959 (which beat Vertigo) - could smite all comers, and render this year's awards historically trivial, even idiotic.

The Oscars often opt for safe, optimistic films, or safe, pessimistic films, that are usually about white men (less often, white women) finding their path to doing the right thin…